Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2019 May 17;68(11):1798-1806.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy775.

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During the 2016-2017 Season

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Influenza Vaccine Effectiveness in the United States During the 2016-2017 Season

Brendan Flannery et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: In recent influenza seasons, the effectiveness of inactivated influenza vaccines against circulating A(H3N2) virus has been lower than against A(H1N1)pdm09 and B viruses, even when circulating viruses remained antigenically similar to vaccine components.

Methods: During the 2016-2017 influenza season, vaccine effectiveness (VE) across age groups and vaccine types was examined among outpatients with acute respiratory illness at 5 US sites using a test-negative design that compared the odds of vaccination among reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirmed influenza positives and negatives.

Results: Among 7083 enrollees, 1342 (19%) tested positive for influenza A(H3N2), 648 (9%) were positive for influenza B (including B/Yamagata, n = 577), and 5040 (71%) were influenza negative. Vaccine effectiveness was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 32% to 46%) against any influenza virus, 33% (95% CI, 23% to 41%) against influenza A(H3N2) viruses, and 53% (95% CI, 43% to 61%) against influenza B viruses.

Conclusions: The 2016-2017 influenza vaccines provided moderate protection against any influenza among outpatients but were less protective against influenza A(H3N2) viruses than B viruses. Approaches to improving effectiveness against A(H3N2) viruses are needed.

Keywords: influenza vaccine; vaccine effectiveness.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Number of enrolled patients with acute respiratory illness testing positive for influenza A(H3N2) (red bars) and influenza B (gray bars), and percent of enrollees testing positive for influenza (black line) by epidemiologic week during the 2016–2017 influenza season.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Flannery B, Zimmerman RK, Gubareva LV, et al. . Enhanced genetic characterization of influenza A(H3N2) viruses and vaccine effectiveness by genetic group, 2014–2015. J Infect Dis 2016; 214:1010–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zimmerman RK, Nowalk MP, Chung J, et al. . 2014–2015 influenza vaccine effectiveness in the United States by vaccine type. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63:1564–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belongia EA, Simpson MD, King JP, et al. . Variable influenza vaccine effectiveness by subtype: a systematic review and meta-analysis of test-negative design studies. Lancet Infect Dis 2016; 16:942–51. - PubMed
    1. Belongia EA, Skowronski DM, McLean HQ, Chambers C, Sundaram ME, De Serres G. Repeated annual influenza vaccination and vaccine effectiveness: review of evidence. Expert Rev Vaccines 2017; 16:1–14. - PubMed
    1. Gaglani M, Spencer S, Ball S, et al. . Antibody response to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 among healthcare personnel receiving trivalent inactivated vaccine: effect of prior monovalent inactivated vaccine. J Infect Dis 2014; 209:1705–14. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms