Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2018 Dec;19(12):1063-1068.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Sep 8.

Quick and Simple FRAIL Scale Predicts Incident Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL (IADL) Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Quick and Simple FRAIL Scale Predicts Incident Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental ADL (IADL) Disabilities: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Gotaro Kojima. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: To quantitatively examine frailty defined by FRAIL scale as a predictor of incident disability risks by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Setting: A systematic review was conducted using 4 electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and PsycINFO) in April 2018 for prospective cohort studies of middle-aged or older people examining associations between frailty and incident disability. Reference lists of the included studies were hand-searched for additional studies. Authors of potentially eligible studies were contacted for additional data if necessary. Methodological quality was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.

Participants: Community-dwelling middle-aged and older people.

Measurements: Incident risks of activities of daily living (ADL) or instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) disability according the FRAIL scale-defined frailty.

Results: Seven studies provided odds ratios of incident disability risks according to frailty and were included in the meta-analysis. A random effects meta-analysis showed that frailty and prefrailty were significant predictors of ADL [pooled odds ratio (OR) = 9.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 4.71-20.46, P < .001 for frailty (FRAIL scale = 3-5) and pooled OR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.77-2.45, P < .001 for prefrailty (FRAIL scale = 1-2) compared with robustness (FRAIL scale = 0); pooled OR = 4.44, 95% CI = 3.26-6.04, P < .001 for frailty compared with nonfrailty (FRAIL scale = 0-2)] and IADL (pooled OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.67-3.73, P < .001, for frailty and pooled OR = 1.74, 95% CI = 1.10-2.77, P = .02, for prefrailty compared with robustness). There was no evidence of publication bias.

Conclusions/implications: The current study demonstrated that frailty status defined by the FRAIL scale was a significant predictor of disability among community-dwelling middle-aged and older individuals. In light of feasibility of the FRAIL scale, especially in a clinical setting, it may be a promising tool to facilitate the translation of frailty research into clinical practice.

Keywords: ADL; FRAIL scale; Frailty; IADL; disability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources