EEG-based auditory attention detection: boundary conditions for background noise and speaker positions
- PMID: 30207293
- DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aae0a6
EEG-based auditory attention detection: boundary conditions for background noise and speaker positions
Abstract
Objective: A listener's neural responses can be decoded to identify the speaker the person is attending to in a cocktail party environment. Such auditory attention detection methods have the potential to provide noise suppression algorithms in hearing devices with information about the listener's attention. A challenge is the effect of noise and other acoustic conditions that can reduce the attention detection accuracy. Specifically, noise can impact the ability of the person to segregate the sound sources and perform selective attention, as well as the external signal processing necessary to decode the attention effectively. The aim of this work is to systematically analyze the effect of noise level and speaker position on attention decoding accuracy.
Approach: 28 subjects participated in the experiment. Auditory stimuli consisted of stories narrated by different speakers from two different locations, along with surrounding multi-talker background babble. EEG signals of the subjects were recorded while they focused on one story and ignored the other. The strength of the babble noise as well as the spatial separation between the two speakers were varied between presentations. Spatio-temporal decoders were trained for each subject, and applied to decode attention of the subjects from every 30 s segment of data. Behavioral speech recognition thresholds were obtained for the different speaker separations.
Main results: Both the background noise level and the angular separation between speakers affected attention decoding accuracy. Remarkably, attention decoding performance was seen to increase with the inclusion of moderate background noise (versus no noise), while across the different noise conditions performance dropped significantly with increasing noise level. We also observed that decoding accuracy improved with increasing speaker separation, exhibiting the advantage of spatial release from masking. Furthermore, the effect of speaker separation on the decoding accuracy became stronger when the background noise level increased. A significant correlation between speech intelligibility and attention decoding accuracy was found across conditions.
Significance: This work shows how the background noise level and relative positions of competing talkers impact attention decoding accuracy. It indicates in which circumstances a neuro-steered noise suppression system may need to operate, in function of acoustic conditions. It also indicates the boundary conditions for the operation of EEG-based attention detection systems in neuro-steered hearing prostheses.
Similar articles
-
Impact of Different Acoustic Components on EEG-Based Auditory Attention Decoding in Noisy and Reverberant Conditions.IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Apr;27(4):652-663. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2903404. Epub 2019 Mar 7. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019. PMID: 30843845
-
Adaptive attention-driven speech enhancement for EEG-informed hearing prostheses.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016 Aug;2016:77-80. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7590644. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2016. PMID: 28268285
-
Congruent audiovisual speech enhances auditory attention decoding with EEG.J Neural Eng. 2019 Nov 6;16(6):066033. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ab4340. J Neural Eng. 2019. PMID: 31505476
-
Temporal context in speech processing and attentional stream selection: a behavioral and neural perspective.Brain Lang. 2012 Sep;122(3):151-61. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.010. Epub 2012 Jan 29. Brain Lang. 2012. PMID: 22285024 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Relating EEG to continuous speech using deep neural networks: a review.J Neural Eng. 2023 Aug 3;20(4). doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ace73f. J Neural Eng. 2023. PMID: 37442115 Review.
Cited by
-
Effects of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Early and Late Cortical Representations of Competing Talkers in Noise.Front Neurosci. 2021 Mar 26;15:636060. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.636060. eCollection 2021. Front Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33841081 Free PMC article.
-
A GRU-CNN model for auditory attention detection using microstate and recurrence quantification analysis.Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 17;14(1):8861. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58886-y. Sci Rep. 2024. PMID: 38632246 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of hearing deficiency using EEG based AEP signals: CWT and improved-VGG16 pipeline.PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 Sep 29;7:e638. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.638. eCollection 2021. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021. PMID: 34712786 Free PMC article.
-
EEGs Vary Less Between Lab and Home Locations Than They Do Between People.Front Comput Neurosci. 2021 Feb 16;15:565244. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2021.565244. eCollection 2021. Front Comput Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33679356 Free PMC article.
-
The interplay of top-down focal attention and the cortical tracking of speech.Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 24;10(1):6922. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63587-3. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32332791 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources