Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. Jan-Dec 2018;22:2331216518796403.
doi: 10.1177/2331216518796403.

Diagnostic Criteria for Somatosensory Tinnitus: A Delphi Process and Face-to-Face Meeting to Establish Consensus

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Diagnostic Criteria for Somatosensory Tinnitus: A Delphi Process and Face-to-Face Meeting to Establish Consensus

Sarah Michiels et al. Trends Hear. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Since somatic or somatosensory tinnitus (ST) was first described as a subtype of subjective tinnitus, where altered somatosensory afference from the cervical spine or temporomandibular area causes or changes a patient's tinnitus perception, several studies in humans and animals have provided a neurophysiological explanation for this type of tinnitus. Due to a lack of unambiguous clinical tests, many authors and clinicians use their own criteria for diagnosing ST. This resulted in large differences in prevalence figures in different studies and limits the comparison of clinical trials on ST treatment. This study aimed to reach an international consensus on diagnostic criteria for ST among experts, scientists and clinicians using a Delphi survey and face-to-face consensus meeting strategy. Following recommended procedures to gain expert consensus, a two-round Delphi survey was delivered online, followed by an in-person consensus meeting. Experts agreed upon a set of criteria that strongly suggest ST. These criteria comprise items on somatosensory modulation, specific tinnitus characteristics, and symptoms that can accompany the tinnitus. None of these criteria have to be present in every single patient with ST, but in case they are present, they strongly suggest the presence of ST. Because of the international nature of the survey, we expect these criteria to gain wide acceptance in the research field and to serve as a guideline for clinicians across all disciplines. Criteria developed in this consensus paper should now allow further investigation of the extent of somatosensory influence in individual tinnitus patients and tinnitus populations.

Keywords: Delphi survey; face-to-face consensus; somatic; somatosensory; tinnitus.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Overview of the inclusion process of articles in the systematic review.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 7 articles

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Abel M. D., Levine R. A. (2004) Muscle contractions and auditory perception in tinnitus patients and nonclinical subjects. Cranio 22(3): 181–191. doi:10.1179/crn.2004.024. - PubMed
    1. Baguley D., McFerran D., Hall D. (2013) Tinnitus. Lancet 382(9904): 1600–1607. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60142-7. - PubMed
    1. Bechter K., Wieland M., Hamann G. F. (2016) Chronic cervicogenic tinnitus rapidly resolved by intermittent use of cervical collar. Frontiers in Psychiatry 7: 43 doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2016.00043. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biesinger E., Groth A., Hoing R., Holzl M. (2015) [Somatosensoric tinnitus]. HNO 63(4): 266–271. doi:10.1007/s00106-014-2971-9. - PubMed
    1. Bosel C., Mazurek B., Haupt H., Peroz I. (2008) [Chronic tinnitus and craniomandibular disorders. Effectiveness of functional therapy on perceived tinnitus distress]. HNO 56(7): 707–713. doi:10.1007/s00106-007-1602-0. - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback