Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2016 Dec 21:2:19-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.cnp.2016.12.003. eCollection 2017.

Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review

Affiliations
Review

Adverse events of tDCS and tACS: A review

Hideyuki Matsumoto et al. Clin Neurophysiol Pract. .

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) have been applied to many research issues because these stimulation techniques can modulate neural activity in the human brain painlessly and non-invasively with weak electrical currents. However, there are no formal safety guidelines for the selection of stimulus parameters in either tDCS or tACS. As a means of gathering the information that is needed to produce safety guidelines, in this article, we summarize the adverse events of tDCS and tACS. In both stimulation techniques, most adverse effects are mild and disappear soon after stimulation. Nevertheless, several papers have reported that, in tDCS, some adverse events persist even after stimulation. The persistent events consist of skin lesions similar to burns, which can arise even in healthy subjects, and mania or hypomania in patients with depression. Recently, one paper reported a pediatric patient presenting with seizure after tDCS, although the causal relationship between stimulation and seizure is not clear. As this seizure is the only serious adverse events yet reported in connection with tDCS, tDCS is considered safe. In tACS, meanwhile, no persistent adverse events have been reported, but considerably fewer reports are available on the safety of tACS than on the safety of tDCS. Therefore, to establish the safety of tDCS and tACS, we need to scan the literature continuously for information on the adverse events of both stimulation techniques. Further safety investigations are also required.

Keywords: Adverse effect; EEG, electroencephalography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; NSE, neuron specific enolase; Safety; Side effect; Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS); Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); rTMS, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; tACS, transcranial alternating current stimulation; tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abd Hamid A.I., Gall C., Speck O., Antal A., Sabel B.A. Effects of alternating current stimulation on the healthy and diseased brain. Front. Neurosci. 2015;9:391. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alon G., Syron S.C., Smith G.V. Is transcranial electrical stimulation (TCES) a safe intervention for children with cerebral palsy? J. Neuro. Rehab. 1998;12:65–72.
    1. Ambrus G.G., Paulus W., Antal A. Cutaneous perception thresholds of electrical stimulation methods: comparison of tDCS and tRNS. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2010;121:1908–1914. - PubMed
    1. Andrade A.C., Magnavita G.M., Allegro J.V., Neto C.E., Lucena Rde C., Fregni F. Feasibility of transcranial direct current stimulation use in children aged 5 to 12 years. J. Child Neurol. 2014;29:1360–1365. - PubMed
    1. Antal A., Herrmann C.S. Transcranial alternating current and random noise stimulation: possible mechanisms. Neural Plast. 2016;2016:3616807. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources