Physiological Changes as a Measure of Crustacean Welfare under Different Standardized Stunning Techniques: Cooling and Electroshock
- PMID: 30231519
- PMCID: PMC6162729
- DOI: 10.3390/ani8090158
Physiological Changes as a Measure of Crustacean Welfare under Different Standardized Stunning Techniques: Cooling and Electroshock
Abstract
Stunning of edible crustaceans to reduce sensory perception prior and during slaughter is an important topic in animal welfare. The purpose of this project was to determine how neural circuits were affected during stunning by examining the physiological function of neural circuits. The central nervous system circuit to a cardiac or skeletal muscle response was examined. Three commercially important crustacean species were utilized for stunning by immersion in an ice slurry below 4 °C and by electrocution; both practices are used in the seafood industry. The blue crab (Callinectes sapidus), the red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii), and the whiteleg shrimp (Litopenaeus vannamei) responded differently to stunning by cold and electric shock. Immersion in ice slurry induced sedation within seconds in crayfish and shrimp but not crabs and cardiac function was reduced fastest in shrimp. However, crabs could retain a functional neural circuit over the same time when shrimp and crayfish were nonresponsive. An electroshock of 10 s paralyzed all three species and subsequently decreased heart rate within 1 min and then heart rate increased but resulted in irregularity over time. Further research is needed to study a state of responsiveness by these methods.
Keywords: blue crab; crayfish; electric stunning; euthanasia; icing; shrimp.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Physiological and Behavioral Indicators to Measure Crustacean Welfare.Animals (Basel). 2019 Nov 3;9(11):914. doi: 10.3390/ani9110914. Animals (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31684181 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of electrical stunning on the nervous activity and physiological stress response of a commercially important decapod crustacean, the brown crab Cancer pagurus L.PLoS One. 2022 Jul 26;17(7):e0270960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270960. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35881570 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of tricaine mesylate on arthropods: crayfish, crab and Drosophila.Invert Neurosci. 2020 May 30;20(3):10. doi: 10.1007/s10158-020-00243-5. Invert Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 32474706
-
Twenty Years of Research in Seabass and Seabream Welfare during Slaughter.Animals (Basel). 2021 Jul 22;11(8):2164. doi: 10.3390/ani11082164. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34438621 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Humane Slaughter of Edible Decapod Crustaceans.Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 11;11(4):1089. doi: 10.3390/ani11041089. Animals (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33920380 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The efficacy of electrical stunning of New Zealand rock lobster (Jasus edwardsii) and freshwater crayfish (Paranephrops zealandicus) using the Crustastun™.Anim Welf. 2023 Aug 22;32:e57. doi: 10.1017/awf.2023.76. eCollection 2023. Anim Welf. 2023. PMID: 38487437 Free PMC article.
-
Methods to Induce Analgesia and Anesthesia in Crustaceans: A Supportive Decision Tool.Biology (Basel). 2023 Feb 28;12(3):387. doi: 10.3390/biology12030387. Biology (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36979080 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Non-Invasive Methods for Assessing the Welfare of Farmed White-Leg Shrimp (Penaeus vannamei).Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;13(5):807. doi: 10.3390/ani13050807. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 36899664 Free PMC article.
-
Perspective: Opportunities for advancing aquatic invertebrate welfare.Front Vet Sci. 2022 Nov 15;9:973376. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.973376. eCollection 2022. Front Vet Sci. 2022. PMID: 36458054 Free PMC article.
-
Impedance Measures for Detecting Electrical Responses during Acute Injury and Exposure of Compounds to Roots of Plants.Methods Protoc. 2022 Jun 30;5(4):56. doi: 10.3390/mps5040056. Methods Protoc. 2022. PMID: 35893582 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 2016. [(accessed on 16 August 2018)]; Available online: http://www.fao.org/fishery/topic/16140/en.
-
- Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare 2005 Aspects of the Biology and Welfare of Animals Used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes. EFSA-Q-2004-105. EFSA J. 2005;292:1–46.
-
- Barr S., Laming P.R., Dick J.T.A., Elwood R.W. Nociception or pain in a decapod crustacean? Anim. Behav. 2008;75:745–751. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.07.004. - DOI
-
- Elwood R.W. Evidence for pain in decapod crustaceans. Anim. Welf. 2012;21:23–27. doi: 10.7120/096272812X13353700593365. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
