Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Sep 25;9(5):e01469-18.
doi: 10.1128/mBio.01469-18.

Botulinum Neurotoxin-Producing Bacteria. Isn't It Time that We Called a Species a Species?

Affiliations

Botulinum Neurotoxin-Producing Bacteria. Isn't It Time that We Called a Species a Species?

Theresa Smith et al. mBio. .

Abstract

Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are produced by a diverse set of seven clostridial species, though alternate naming systems have developed over the last 100 years. Starting in the 1950s, a single-species taxonomy where any bacterium producing BoNT would be designated Clostridium botulinum was introduced. As the extreme diversity of these strains was recognized, a secondary system of taxonomic "groups" evolved. It became clear that these groups also had members that did not produce BoNT, and in some cases, they were given formal species names. Genomic analysis now clearly identifies species affiliations whether an isolate is toxigenic or not. It is clear that C. botulinum group nomenclature is no longer appropriate and that there are recognized species names for each clostridium. We advocate for the use of the scientific binomials and that the single-species group nomenclature be abandoned.

Keywords: Clostridium botulinum; botulinum neurotoxin; botulism; phylogenetic analysis; taxonomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Dendrograms of BoNT-producing bacteria and closely related isolates. DNA sequence analysis of 54 isolates using 16S rRNA gene sequences (aligned with MUSCLE [32]) and maximum-likelihood analysis (IQ-TREE [33, 34]) (A) and using whole-genome sequences to estimate average nucleotide identity (ANI) with Mash (k = 21, s = 1,000,000) (30) followed by clustering with the unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) within QIIME (35) (B). Both methods separate the isolates into 7 taxonomic categories consistent with the historical species designations.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hatheway CL. 1988. Botulism, p 111–133. In Balows A, Hausler WH, Ohashi J, Turano A (ed), Laboratory diagnosis of infectious diseases. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
    1. Collins MD, East AK. 1998. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the food-borne pathogen Clostridium botulinum and its neurotoxins. J Appl Microbiol 84:5–17. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.1997.00313.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hill KK, Smith TJ, Helma CH, Ticknor LO, Foley BT, Svensson RT, Brown JL, Johnson EA, Smith LA, Okinaka RT, Jackson PJ, Marks JD. 2007. Genetic diversity among botulinum neurotoxin-producing clostridial strains. J Bacteriol 189:818–832. doi:10.1128/JB.01180-06. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stackebrandt E, Kramer I, Swiderski J, Hippe H. 1999. Phylogenetic basis for a taxonomic dissection of the genus Clostridium. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 24:253–258. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695X.1999.tb01291.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Peck MW. 2009. Biology and genomic analysis of Clostridium botulinum. Adv Microb Physiol 55:183–265. 320. doi:10.1016/S0065-2911(09)05503-9. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources