Feeding tube securement in critical illness: implications for safety

Br J Nurs. 2018 Oct 4;27(18):1036-1041. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2018.27.18.1036.

Abstract

Over 50 % of tape-secured feeding tubes are inadvertently lost. The impact of nasal bridle securement on nasogastric (NG) and nasointestinal (NI) tube loss, outcome and duration of use was determined from 1 October 2014 (NG) and 1 January 2010 respectively to 31 December 2017. From this and published data, the potential impact of nasal bridles on major complications was determined. Use of nasal bridles was independently associated with: an 80% reduction in inadvertent NI tube loss (odds ratio (OR): 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.2: 0.12-0.33, p<0.0001); increased duration of tube use (2.2 days, 95% CI: 0.7-3.7, p= 0.004); and an almost threefold likelihood of tubes being used until no longer needed (OR: 2.8, 95%CI: 1.9-4.3, p<0.0001). In a single-room intensive care unit, inadvertent tube loss dropped from 53% to 9% and tube redundancy (tube no longer required) rose from 20% to 64%. UK-wide bridle securement, by reducing premature tube loss and the need for replacement by 40%, could be associated with 1422 fewer pneumonias or pneumothoraces and 768 fewer deaths.

Keywords: Enteral feeding tube; Inadvertent feeding tube loss; Nasal bridle; Safety; Securement.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Critical Illness
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / adverse effects
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / instrumentation*
  • Intubation, Gastrointestinal / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Safety
  • Retrospective Studies