The effectiveness of peer support on self-efficacy and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

J Adv Nurs. 2019 Apr;75(4):711-722. doi: 10.1111/jan.13870. Epub 2018 Nov 12.

Abstract

Background: Peer support has been suggested as a promising approach for diabetes management. No conclusive evidence exists on the effects of peer support on self-efficacy and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Objective: To assess the effectiveness of peer support on self-efficacy and the quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.

Data sources: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Allied Health Literature database guide for relevant literatures from inception to 30 September 2017.

Review methods: The review was conducted according to the guidelines of Cochrane Collaboration. The outcomes were self-efficacy and quality of life. The standardized mean difference and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for pooled results.

Results: A total of 15 studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled results revealed that peer support did not significantly improve self-efficacy and quality of life in adults with type 2 diabetes, but significantly improved self-efficacy and quality of life in studies with intervention duration ≤6 months. There was no evidence of publication bias.

Conclusion: Peer support intervention did not lead to better effects on the improvement in self-efficacy and quality of life among adults with type 2 diabetes. However, peer support with intervention duration not more than 6 months had positive effects on self-efficacy and quality of life. More high-quality studies with large sample size are needed to support or counter the results.

背景: 有人建议将同伴支持作为一种有希望的糖尿病管理方法。但是,并不存在确凿证据足以证明同伴支持在2型糖尿病成年患者自我效能和生活质量方面的效果。 目的: 评估同伴支持在2型糖尿病成年患者自我效能和生活质量方面的有效性。 设计: 随机对照研究的系统性评价和荟萃分析。 数据来源: 我们搜索了PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled 从开始至2017年9月30日的相关文献的试验和联合健康文献数据库指南 综述方法: 该评价按照科克伦协作组织指南进行。结果是自我效能和生活质量。并且,为汇集结果,计算标准平均差和95%置信区间。 结果: 总共有15项研究满足纳入标准。汇集结果表明,同伴支持并不会显著提高2型糖尿病成年患者的自我效能和生活质量,但是,却在干预持续时间不超过6个月的研究方面显著提高了自我效能和生活质量。没有证据显示存在发表性偏倚情况。 结论: 同伴支持干预并不会给2型糖尿病成年患者自我效能和生活质量的提升带来更好的效果。然而,在干预持续时间不超过6个月的情况下,同伴支持对自我效能和生活质量有着积极的效果。我们需要具有大样本量的更多高质量研究来支持或反驳该结果。.

Keywords: adults; effectiveness; meta-analysis; nursing; peer support; quality of life; self-efficacy; self-management; systematic review; type 2 diabetes.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / psychology*
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / therapy
  • Humans
  • Peer Group
  • Quality of Life*
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Self Care
  • Self Efficacy*
  • Social Support