Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Oct;29(6):842-851.
doi: 10.1038/s41370-018-0079-0. Epub 2018 Oct 9.

Verifying Locations of Sources of Historical Environmental Releases of Dioxin-Like Compounds in the U.S.: Implications for Exposure Assessment and Epidemiologic Inference

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Verifying Locations of Sources of Historical Environmental Releases of Dioxin-Like Compounds in the U.S.: Implications for Exposure Assessment and Epidemiologic Inference

Rena R Jones et al. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxin and dibenzofuran (PCDD/F) emissions from industrial sources contaminate the surrounding environment. Proximity-based exposure surrogates assume accuracy in the location of PCDD/F sources, but locations are not often verified. We manually reviewed locations (i.e., smokestack geo-coordinates) in a historical database of 4478 PCDD/F-emitting facilities in 2009 and 2016. Given potential changes in imagery and other resources over this period, we re-reviewed a random sample of 5% of facilities (n = 240) in 2016. Comparing the original and re-review of this sample, we evaluated agreement in verification (location confirmed or not) and distances between verified locations (verification error), overall and by facility type. Using the verified location from re-review as a gold standard, we estimated the accuracy of proximity-based exposure metrics and epidemiologic bias. Overall agreement in verification was high (>84%), and verification errors were small (median = 84 m) but varied by facility type. Accuracy of exposure classification (≥1 facility within 5 km) for a hypothetical study population also varied by facility type (sensitivity: 69-96%; specificity: 95-98%). Odds ratios were attenuated 11-69%, with the largest bias for rare facility types. We found good agreement between reviews of PCDD/F source locations, and that exposure prevalence and facility type may influence associations with exposures derived from this database. Our findings highlight the need to consider location error and other contextual factors when using proximity-based exposure metrics.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Example of census block groups and residences within a 5km buffer (red circle) and adjacent 5–10 km unexposed area (blue circle) around a facility location (star).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Geographic distribution of dioxin- and furan-emitting facilities in the U.S.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Polychlorinated dibenzo-para-dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans 1997. - PMC - PubMed
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodiobenzo-para-dioxin, 2,3,4,7,8=ppentachlorodibenzofuran, and 3,3’,4,4’,5-pentachlorobiphenyl 2012.
    1. Viel JF, Arveux P, Baverel J, Cahn JY. Soft-tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma clusters around a municipal solid waste incinerator with high dioxin emission levels. Am J Epidemiology 2000;152(1):13–9. - PubMed
    1. Floret N, Mauny F, Challier B, Arveux P, Cahn JY, Viel JF. Dioxin emissions from a solid waste incinerator and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Epidemiology 2003;14(4):392–8. - PubMed
    1. Viel JF, Daniau C, Goria S, Fabre P, de Crouy-Chanel P, Sauleau EA, et al. Risk for non Hodgkin’s lymphoma in the vicinity of French municipal solid waste incinerators. Environ Health 2008;7:51. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Feedback