Effect of Immediate vs Delayed Pushing on Rates of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Receiving Neuraxial Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- PMID: 30304425
- PMCID: PMC6583005
- DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.13986
Effect of Immediate vs Delayed Pushing on Rates of Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Among Nulliparous Women Receiving Neuraxial Analgesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Abstract
Importance: It is unclear whether the timing of second stage pushing efforts affects spontaneous vaginal delivery rates and reduces morbidities.
Objective: To evaluate whether immediate or delayed pushing results in higher rates of spontaneous vaginal delivery and lower rates of maternal and neonatal morbidities.
Design, setting, and participants: Pragmatic randomized clinical trial of nulliparous women at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation admitted for spontaneous or induced labor with neuraxial analgesia between May 2014 and December 2017 at 6 US medical centers. The interim analysis suggested futility for the primary outcome and recruitment was terminated with 2414 of 3184 planned participants. Follow-up ended January 4, 2018.
Interventions: Randomization occurred when participants reached complete cervical dilation. Immediate group participants (n = 1200) began pushing immediately. Delayed group participants (n = 1204) were instructed to wait 60 minutes.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was spontaneous vaginal delivery. Secondary outcomes included total duration of the second stage, duration of active pushing, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, perineal lacerations (≥second degree), and a composite outcome of neonatal morbidity that included neonatal death and 9 other adverse outcomes.
Results: Among 2414 women randomized (mean age, 26.5 years), 2404 (99.6%) completed the trial. The rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery was 85.9% in the immediate group vs 86.5% in the delayed group, and was not significantly different (absolute difference, -0.6% [95% CI, -3.4% to 2.1%]; relative risk, 0.99 [95% CI, 0.96 to 1.03]). There was no significant difference in 5 of the 9 prespecified secondary outcomes reported, including the composite outcome of neonatal morbidity (7.3% for the immediate group vs 8.9% for the delayed group; between-group difference, -1.6% [95% CI, -3.8% to 0.5%]) and perineal lacerations (45.9% vs 46.4%, respectively; between-group difference, -0.4% [95% CI, -4.4% to 3.6%]). The immediate group had significantly shorter mean duration of the second stage compared with the delayed group (102.4 vs 134.2 minutes, respectively; mean difference, -31.8 minutes [95% CI, -36.7 to -26.9], P < .001), despite a significantly longer mean duration of active pushing (83.7 vs 74.5 minutes; mean difference, 9.2 minutes [95% CI, 5.8 to 12.6], P < .001), lower rates of chorioamnionitis (6.7% vs 9.1%; between-group difference, -2.5% [95% CI, -4.6% to -0.3%], P = .005), and fewer postpartum hemorrhages (2.3% vs 4.0%; between-group difference, -1.7% [95% CI, -3.1% to -0.4%], P = .03).
Conclusions and relevance: Among nulliparous women receiving neuraxial anesthesia, the timing of second stage pushing efforts did not affect the rate of spontaneous vaginal delivery. These findings may help inform decisions about the preferred timing of second stage pushing efforts, when considered with other maternal and neonatal outcomes.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02137200.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Immediate vs Delayed Pushing During the Second Stage of Labor.JAMA. 2018 Oct 9;320(14):1439-1440. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12877. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30304414 No abstract available.
-
Timing of Second Stage Pushing Doesn't Affect Spontaneous Vaginal Delivery Rate.Am J Nurs. 2019 Jan;119(1):51. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000552613.11900.97. Am J Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30589709 No abstract available.
-
PURL: Immediate or delayed pushing in the second stage of labor?J Fam Pract. 2020 May;69(4):207-208. J Fam Pract. 2020. PMID: 32437485 Free PMC article.
Similar articles
-
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Oct 9;(10):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 26;3:CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3 PMID: 26451755 Updated. Review.
-
Pushing/bearing down methods for the second stage of labour.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 26;3(3):CD009124. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009124.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28349526 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Delayed versus immediate pushing in the second stage of labor in women with neuraxial analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):189-203. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.002. Epub 2020 Feb 15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. PMID: 32067972
-
A randomised clinical trial comparing the effects of delayed versus immediate pushing with epidural analgesia on mode of delivery and faecal continence.BJOG. 2002 Dec;109(12):1359-65. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-0528.2002.02109.x. BJOG. 2002. PMID: 12504971 Clinical Trial.
-
Delayed versus early pushing during the second stage of labour in primigravidas under epidural anaesthesia with occipitoposterior malposition: a randomised controlled study.J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022 Jan;42(1):23-27. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1867973. Epub 2021 Apr 23. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2022. Retraction in: J Obstet Gynaecol. 2023 Dec;43(2):2259731. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2023.2259731 PMID: 33892614 Retracted. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Impact of the Duration of the Second Stage of Labor on Postpartum Pelvic Floor Symptoms.Urogynecology (Phila). 2024 Mar 1;30(3):381-387. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001477. Urogynecology (Phila). 2024. PMID: 38484257 Clinical Trial.
-
First and Second Stage Risk Factors Associated with Perineal Lacerations.Matern Child Health J. 2024 Jul;28(7):1228-1233. doi: 10.1007/s10995-024-03919-1. Epub 2024 Mar 5. Matern Child Health J. 2024. PMID: 38441866 Clinical Trial.
-
Mode of delivery and birth outcomes in relation to the duration of the passive second stage of labour: A retrospective cohort study of nulliparous women.PLoS One. 2023 Jan 30;18(1):e0281183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281183. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36716315 Free PMC article.
-
Nomogram based on the final antepartum ultrasound features before delivery for predicting failed spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.Front Surg. 2023 Jan 6;9:1048866. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1048866. eCollection 2022. Front Surg. 2023. PMID: 36684290 Free PMC article.
-
Protocol for a multicenter, double-blinded placebo-controlled randomized controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric derisomaltose to oral ferrous sulfate for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: The IVIDA2 trial.Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Dec;123:106992. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106992. Epub 2022 Nov 8. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 36368479 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2015. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2017;66(1):1. - PubMed
-
- Gilstrap LC III, Hauth JC, Hankins GD, Beck AW. Second-stage fetal heart rate abnormalities and type of neonatal acidemia. Obstet Gynecol. 1987;70(2):191-195. - PubMed
-
- Hansen SL, Clark SL, Foster JC. Active pushing versus passive fetal descent in the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99(1):29-34. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
