Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 1:10:299.
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00299. eCollection 2018.

Jigsaw Puzzling Taps Multiple Cognitive Abilities and Is a Potential Protective Factor for Cognitive Aging

Affiliations
Free PMC article

Jigsaw Puzzling Taps Multiple Cognitive Abilities and Is a Potential Protective Factor for Cognitive Aging

Patrick Fissler et al. Front Aging Neurosci. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Prevention of neurocognitive disorders is currently one of the greatest unmet medical challenges. The cognitive effects of solving jigsaw puzzles (JPs) have not been studied so far, despite its frequent use as a leisure activity in all age cohorts worldwide. This study aimed at closing this gap between a lack of science and a frequent real-world use by investigating the cognitive abilities recruited by JP as well as the cognitive benefits of lifetime and 30-day JP experience. A total of 100 cognitively healthy adults (≥50 years of age) were randomized to either a 30-day home-based JP intervention (≥1 h/day) plus four sessions of cognitive health counseling (JP group) or four sessions of cognitive health counseling only (counseling group). We measured global visuospatial cognition by averaging the scores of eight z-standardized visuospatial cognitive abilities (perception, constructional praxis, mental rotation, speed, flexibility, working memory, reasoning, and episodic memory). JP skill was assessed with an untrained 40 piece JP and lifetime JP experience with retrospective self-report. JP skill was associated with all assessed cognitive abilities (rs ≥ 0.45, ps < 0.001), and global visuospatial cognition (r = 0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.86], p < 0.001). Lifetime JP experience was associated with global visuospatial cognition, even after accounting for other risk and protective factors (β = 0.34 [95% CI: 0.18-0.50], p < 0.001). The JP group connected on average 3589 pieces in 49 h. Compared to the counseling group, they improved in JP skill (Cohen's d = 0.38 [95% CI: 0.21-0.54], p < 0.001), but not in global visuospatial cognition (Cohen's d = -0.08, [CI: -0.27 to 0.10], p = 0.39). The amount of jigsaw puzzling was related to changes in global visuospatial cognition within the JP group, only after accounting for baseline performance (β = 0.33 [95% CI: 0.02-0.63], p = 0.03). In sum, our results indicate that jigsaw puzzling strongly engages multiple cognitive abilities and long-term, but not short-term JP experiences could relevantly benefit cognition. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02667314.

Keywords: cognitive aging; cognitive enrichment; cognitive impairment; cognitive intervention; dementia; jigsaw puzzles; neurocognitive disorders; visuospatial cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
CONSORT flow chart. aCompleted at least 24 days with a minimum of 45 min and at least three of four cognitive health counseling sessions, bcompleted at least three of four cognitive health counseling sessions, and cparticipants reported solving jigsaw puzzles in the intervention period.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Cognitive demands of solving jigsaw puzzles. Association between jigsaw puzzle skill and global visuospatial cognition in the complete sample (n = 100).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Lifetime jigsaw puzzles experience as a protective factor of cognitive aging. Association between lifetime jigsaw puzzle experience and global visuospatial cognition in the complete sample (n = 99, one missing value).
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Intervention effect on the primary outcome. The puzzle group showed a pretest–posttest improvement of d = 0.38, p < 0.001; the counseling group of d = 0.46, p < 0.001, with an intervention effect size in favor of the counseling group of d = 0.08, p = 0.39; ∗∗∗p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Dose–response analysis. Association between the number of connected puzzle pieces and change in global visuospatial cognition (adjusted for baseline performance) in the puzzle group (n = 51, one missing value).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ball K., Berch D., Helmers K., Jobe J., Leveck M., Marsiske M., et al. (2002). Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA J. Am. Med. Assoc. 288 2271–2281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ballesteros S., Mayas J., Prieto A., Ruiz-Marquez E., Toril P., Reales J. M. (2017). Effects of video game training on measures of selective attention and working memory in older adults: results from a randomized controlled trial. Front. Aging Neurosci. 9:354 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00354 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barnes D.E., Santos-Modesitt W., Poelke G., Kramer A.F., Castro C., Middleton L.E., et al. (2013). The Mental Activity and eXercise (MAX) trial: a randomized controlled trial to enhance cognitive function in older adults. JAMA Intern. Med. 173 797–804. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.189 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bediou B., Adams D. M., Mayer R. E., Tipton E., Green C. S., Bavelier D. (2018). Meta-analysis of action video game impact on perceptual, attentional, and cognitive skills. Psychol. Bull. 144 77–110. 10.1037/bul0000130 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Benton A., Sivan A., Hamsher K., Varney N., Spreen O. (1994). Contributions to Neuropsychological Assessment: a Clinical Manual. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Associated data