Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2018 Dec 1;29(12):2379-2383.
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy458.

Nanoscale extracellular vesicle-derived DNA is superior to circulating cell-free DNA for mutation detection in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Comparative Study

Nanoscale extracellular vesicle-derived DNA is superior to circulating cell-free DNA for mutation detection in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer

Y Wan et al. Ann Oncol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Background: The comparison between relatively intact nanoscale extracellular vesicle-derived DNA (nEV-DNA) and fragmented circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in mutation detection among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has not been carried out yet, and thus deserves investigation.

Patients and methods: Both nEV-DNA and cfDNA was obtained from 377 NSCLC patients with known EGFR mutation status and 69 controls. The respective EGFRE19del/T790M/L858R mutation status was interrogated with amplification-refractory-mutation-system-based PCR assays (ARMS-PCR).

Results: Neither nEV-DNA nor cfDNA levels show a strong correlation with tumor volumes. There is no correlation between cfDNA and nEV-DNA levels either. The detection sensitivity of nEV-DNA and cfDNA using ARMS-PCR in early-stage NSCLC was 25.7% and 14.2%, respectively, with 96.6% and 91.7% specificity, respectively. In late-stage NSCLC, both nEV-DNA and cfDNA show ∼80% sensitivity and over 95% specificity.

Conclusions: nEV-DNA is superior to cfDNA for mutation detection in early-stage NSCLC using ARMS-PCR. However, the advantages vanish in late-stage NSCLC.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Measurement and analyses of nanoscale extracellular vesicle-derived DNA (nEV-DNA) and cell-free DNA (cfDNA). (A) nEV-DNA levels and cfDNA levels in two stages (cfDNA versus EV-DNA, ***P <0.0001; stage II cfDNA versus stage I cfDNA, ***P <0.0001; stage II nEV-DNA versus stage I nEV-DNA, **P <0.001). (B) The correlation between nEV-DNA levels and cfDNA levels.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Andaloussi SE, Mäger I, Breakefield XO, Wood MJ.. Extracellular vesicles: biology and emerging therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2013; 12(5): 347–357. - PubMed
    1. Raposo G, Stoorvogel W.. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 2013; 200(4): 373–383. - PMC - PubMed
    1. György B, Szabó TG, Pásztói M. et al. Membrane vesicles, current state-of-the-art: emerging role of extracellular vesicles. Cell Mol Life Sci 2011; 68(16): 2667–2688. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Im H, Shao H, Park YI. et al. Label-free detection and molecular profiling of exosomes with a nano-plasmonic sensor. Nat Biotechnol 2014; 32(5): 490. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahlert C, Melo SA, Protopopov A. et al. Identification of double-stranded genomic DNA spanning all chromosomes with mutated KRAS and p53 DNA in the serum exosomes of patients with pancreatic cancer. J Biol Chem 2014; 289(7): 3869–3875. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms