In vitro activities of cefiderocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and other comparative drugs against imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, all associated with bloodstream infections in Taiwan
- PMID: 30357343
- DOI: 10.1093/jac/dky425
In vitro activities of cefiderocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam and other comparative drugs against imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, all associated with bloodstream infections in Taiwan
Abstract
Objectives: We investigated the in vitro activities of cefiderocol, ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam and other related drugs against imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, imipenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates.
Methods: Non-duplicated bacteraemia isolates (n = 300) of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (n = 100), imipenem-resistant A. baumannii (n = 100) and S. maltophilia (n = 100) were evaluated. Imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates were defined as isolates exhibiting imipenem MIC ≥8 mg/L, as determined using the VITEK 2 system. The MICs of 11 other antimicrobial agents for the isolates were determined by the broth microdilution method. Iron-depleted CAMHB was used to determine the MICs of cefiderocol.
Results: The rates of colistin resistance of imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa and imipenem-resistant A. baumannii were 5% and 10%, respectively. The MIC90 values of cefiderocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam, ceftazidime/avibactam, tigecycline and colistin were as follows: imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa: 1, 4, 16, >4 and 2 mg/L; imipenem-resistant A. baumannii: 8, >64, >64, 4 and 2 mg/L; and S. maltophilia: 0.25, >64, >64, 2 and >8 mg/L, respectively. For imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates, the MICs of cefiderocol, ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam were ≤4 mg/L for 88%, 8% and 1% of the isolates, respectively. Cefiderocol MICs were ≤4 mg/L for the five colistin-resistant imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa isolates and 70% of the 10 colistin-resistant imipenem-resistant A. baumannii isolates.
Conclusions: Cefiderocol exhibited more potent in vitro activity than ceftolozane/tazobactam and ceftazidime/avibactam against imipenem-resistant P. aeruginosa, imipenem-resistant A. baumannii and S. maltophilia isolates.
Similar articles
-
Activity of cefiderocol against high-risk clones of multidrug-resistant Enterobacterales, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020 Jul 1;75(7):1840-1849. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaa117. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2020. PMID: 32277821 Free PMC article.
-
Activity of cefiderocol, imipenem/relebactam, cefepime/taniborbactam and cefepime/zidebactam against ceftolozane/tazobactam- and ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Sep 30;77(10):2809-2815. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac241. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022. PMID: 35904000
-
Antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam, ceftolozane/tazobactam, imipenem/relebactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, and comparators against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from patients with skin and soft tissue infections.Int J Infect Dis. 2021 Dec;113:279-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.10.022. Epub 2021 Oct 17. Int J Infect Dis. 2021. PMID: 34670144
-
Cefiderocol: A Siderophore Cephalosporin with Activity Against Carbapenem-Resistant and Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacilli.Drugs. 2019 Feb;79(3):271-289. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-1055-2. Drugs. 2019. PMID: 30712199 Review.
-
Global prevalence of cefiderocol non-susceptibility in Enterobacterales, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024 Feb;30(2):178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2023.08.029. Epub 2023 Sep 4. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2024. PMID: 37666449 Review.
Cited by
-
Global mapping of antibiotic resistance rates among clinical isolates of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024 Mar 19;23(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12941-024-00685-4. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2024. PMID: 38504262 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In vitro activity of cefiderocol and comparator antibiotics against multidrug-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli.JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Feb 1;6(1):dlae006. doi: 10.1093/jacamr/dlae006. eCollection 2024 Feb. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2024. PMID: 38304722 Free PMC article.
-
Biofilm formation: mechanistic insights and therapeutic targets.Mol Biomed. 2023 Dec 15;4(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s43556-023-00164-w. Mol Biomed. 2023. PMID: 38097907 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In vitro Activity of Cefiderocol Against Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates: a Single Center Experience.Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2023 Jul 1;15(1):e2023043. doi: 10.4084/MJHID.2023.043. eCollection 2023. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 37435038 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
In vitro activities of antimicrobial combinations against planktonic and biofilm forms of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia.Front Microbiol. 2023 Jun 20;14:1186669. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1186669. eCollection 2023. Front Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37408643 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
