Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct;5(4):256-263.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.08.006. Epub 2018 Sep 4.

Indications and Contraindications for Shock Wave Lithotripsy and How to Improve Outcomes

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Indications and Contraindications for Shock Wave Lithotripsy and How to Improve Outcomes

Luke F Reynolds et al. Asian J Urol. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

For over 35 years shock wave lithotripsy has proven to be an effective, safe and truly minimally invasive option for the treatment of nephrolithiasis. Various technical factors as well as patient selection can impact the success of the procedure. We used published work focusing on outcomes of shock wave lithotripsy, risk of complications, and strategies for improving stone fragmentation to create this review. Multiple patient and technical factors have been found to impact success of treatment. Skin to stone distance, stone density and composition, size and location of the stone within the urinary system all influence stone free rates. A slower rate with a gradual increasing voltage, precise targeting, proper coupling will improve stone fragmentation and decrease risk of complications. The selection of appropriate patients through a shared decision making process and attention to the technical factors that improve stone free rates is key to providing an effective treatment and patient satisfaction.

Keywords: Extracorporeal shock wave therapy; Kidney calculi; Lithotripsy; Nephrolithiasis; Urolithiasis.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Chaussy C., Brendel W., Schmiedt E. Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet. 1980;2:1265–1268. - PubMed
    1. Assimos D., Krambeck A., Miller N.L., Monga M., Murad M.H., Nelson C.P. Surgical management of stones: american urological association/endourological society guideline, PART II. J Urol. 2016;196:1161–1169. - PubMed
    1. Pearle M.S., Lingeman J.E., Leveillee R., Kuo R., Preminger G.M., Nadler R.B. Prospective, randomized trial comparing shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi 1 cm or less. J Urol. 2005;173:2005–2009. - PubMed
    1. Singh B.P., Prakash J., Sankhwar S.N., Dhakad U., Sankhwar P.L., Goel A. Retrograde intrarenal surgery vs. extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for intermediate size inferior pole calculi: a prospective assessment of objective and subjective outcomes. Urology. 2014;83:1016–1022. - PubMed
    1. Park J., Shin D.W., Chung J.H., Lee S.W. Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi: a prospective assessment of patient-reported outcomes. World J Urol. 2013;31:1569–1574. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback