Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Oct 29;26(1):90.
doi: 10.1186/s13049-018-0559-1.

Best practice guidelines for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI)

Affiliations

Best practice guidelines for blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI)

Tor Brommeland et al. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a non-penetrating injury to the carotid and/or vertebral artery that may cause stroke in trauma patients. Historically BCVI has been considered rare but more recent publications indicate an overall incidence of 1-2% in the in-hospital trauma population and as high as 9% in patients with severe head injury. The indications for screening, treatment and follow-up of these patients have been controversial for years with few clear recommendations. In an attempt to provide a clinically oriented guideline for the handling of BCVI patients a working committee was created. The current guideline is the end result of this committees work. It is based on a systematic literature search and critical review of all available publications in addition to a standardized consensus process. We recommend using the expanded Denver screening criteria and CT angiography (CTA) for the detection of BCVI. Early antithrombotic treatment should be commenced as soon as considered safe and continued for at least 3 months. A CTA at 7 days to confirm or discard the diagnosis as well as a final imaging control at 3 months should be performed.

Keywords: CT angiography; Guidelines; Screening; Trauma; Vascular injury.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable as this is a systematic review based on published literature.

Consent for publication

Not applicable as this is a systematic review.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram for selection of included studies
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow-diagram summarizing the current guidelines for screening, treatment and followup of patients with BCVI

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Biffl WL, Moore EE, Offner PJ, Burch JM. Blunt carotid and vertebral Arterial Injuries. World J Surg. 2001;25:1036–1043. doi: 10.1007/s00268-001-0056-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blickenstaff KL, Weaver FA, Yellin AE, et al. Trends in the management of traumatic vertebral artery injuries. Am J Surg. 1989;158:101–106. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90355-3. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rogers FB, Baker EF, Osler TM, et al. Computed tomographic angiography as a screening modality for blunt cervical arterial injuries. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1999;46:380–385. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199903000-00005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Laser A, Kufera J, Bruns BR, et al. Initial screening test for blunt cerebrovascular injury: validity assessment of whole-body computed tomography. Surgery. 2015;158:627–635. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.063. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schicho A, Luerken L, Meier R, et al. Incidence of traumatic carotid and vertebral artery dissections: results of cervical vessel computed tomography angiogram as a mandatory scan component in severely injured patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:173–178. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S148176. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources