Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension
- PMID: 30383082
- PMCID: PMC6583613
- DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4684
Benefits and Harms of Antihypertensive Treatment in Low-Risk Patients With Mild Hypertension
Abstract
Importance: Evidence to support initiation of pharmacologic treatment in low-risk patients with mild hypertension is inconclusive, with previous trials underpowered to demonstrate benefit. Clinical guidelines across the world are contradictory.
Objective: To examine whether antihypertensive treatment is associated with a low risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease (CVD) in low-risk patients with mild hypertension.
Design, setting, and participants: In this longitudinal cohort study, data were extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, from January 1, 1998, through September 30, 2015, for patients aged 18 to 74 years who had mild hypertension (untreated blood pressure of 140/90-159/99 mm Hg) and no previous treatment. Anyone with a history of CVD or CVD risk factors was excluded. Patients exited the cohort if follow-up records became unavailable or they experienced an outcome of interest.
Exposures: Prescription of antihypertensive medication. Propensity scores for likelihood of treatment were constructed using a logistic regression model. Individuals treated within 12 months of diagnosis were matched to untreated patients by propensity score using the nearest-neighbor method.
Main outcomes and measures: The rates of mortality, CVD, and adverse events among patients prescribed antihypertensive treatment at baseline, compared with those who were not prescribed such treatment, using Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: A total of 19 143 treated patients (mean [SD] age, 54.7 [11.8] years; 10 705 [55.9%] women; 10 629 [55.5%] white) were matched to 19 143 similar untreated patients (mean [SD] age, 54.9 [12.2] years; 10 631 [55.5%] female; 10 654 [55.7%] white). During a median follow-up period of 5.8 years (interquartile range, 2.6-9.0 years), no evidence of an association was found between antihypertensive treatment and mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% CI, 0.88-1.17) or between antihypertensive treatment and CVD (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.95-1.25). Treatment was associated with an increased risk of adverse events, including hypotension (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.30-2.20; number needed to harm at 10 years [NNH10], 41), syncope (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.50; NNH10, 35), electrolyte abnormalities (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.12-2.65; NNH10, 111), and acute kidney injury (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.00-1.88; NNH10, 91).
Conclusions and relevance: This prespecified analysis found no evidence to support guideline recommendations that encourage initiation of treatment in patients with low-risk mild hypertension. There was evidence of an increased risk of adverse events, which suggests that physicians should exercise caution when following guidelines that generalize findings from trials conducted in high-risk individuals to those at lower risk.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Older People Might Be at Most Serious Risk in Antihypertensive Treatment.JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):590. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8600. JAMA Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30933221 No abstract available.
-
Older People Might Be at Most Serious Risk in Antihypertensive Treatment-Reply.JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Apr 1;179(4):590-591. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.8619. JAMA Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30933229 No abstract available.
-
Harm-benefit analysis: treatment of mild hypertension in low-risk individuals.Evid Based Nurs. 2019 Oct;22(4):110. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2018-103050. Epub 2019 Apr 4. Evid Based Nurs. 2019. PMID: 30948433 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Estimating the Association of the 2017 and 2014 Hypertension Guidelines With Cardiovascular Events and Deaths in US Adults: An Analysis of National Data.JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Jul 1;3(7):572-581. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.1240. JAMA Cardiol. 2018. PMID: 29800138 Free PMC article.
-
Association of Blood Pressure Classification in Young Adults Using the 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Blood Pressure Guideline With Cardiovascular Events Later in Life.JAMA. 2018 Nov 6;320(17):1774-1782. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13551. JAMA. 2018. PMID: 30398601 Free PMC article.
-
Blood pressure targets in adults with hypertension.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 17;12(12):CD004349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004349.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33332584 Free PMC article.
-
First-line drugs inhibiting the renin angiotensin system versus other first-line antihypertensive drug classes for hypertension.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 11;1:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 14;11:CD008170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008170.pub3. PMID: 25577154 Updated. Review.
-
Pharmacotherapy for hypertension-induced left ventricular hypertrophy.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 10;10(10):CD012039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012039.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021. PMID: 34628642 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
CureAPP HT is expected to be one piece of the puzzle that physicians and patients can work together to solve the problem of uncontrolled hypertension.Hypertens Res. 2024 Oct 25. doi: 10.1038/s41440-024-01962-7. Online ahead of print. Hypertens Res. 2024. PMID: 39455864 No abstract available.
-
Evaluating Blood Pressure Variability in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: An Insight into Non-Dipping Patterns and Their Clinical Implications.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Sep 30;17:4445-4454. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S484183. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 39372135 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Patients Classified as High-Risk between International Cardiovascular Disease Primary Prevention Guidelines.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 26;13(15):4379. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154379. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39124648 Free PMC article.
-
Blood pressure status, trajectories and cardiovascular disease: the CoLaus|PsyCoLaus prospective study.Open Heart. 2024 Feb 22;11(1):e002556. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2023-002556. Open Heart. 2024. PMID: 38388190 Free PMC article.
-
Therapeutical Approach to Arterial Hypertension - Current State of the Art.Curr Med Chem. 2024;31(29):4602-4620. doi: 10.2174/0109298673274823231220063652. Curr Med Chem. 2024. PMID: 38303535 Review.
References
-
- Lewington S, Clarke R, Qizilbash N, Peto R, Collins R; Prospective Studies Collaboration . Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies. Lancet. 2002;360(9349):1903-1913. published Online First: 2002/12/21. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11911-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Whitworth JA; World Health Organization, International Society of Hypertension Writing Group . 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J Hypertens. 2003;21(11):1983-1992. doi:10.1097/00004872-200311000-00002 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. ; Task Force Members . 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2013;31(7):1281-1357. doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
