Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 2;20(11):e10524.
doi: 10.2196/10524.

Insights Into Older Adult Patient Concerns Around the Caregiver Proxy Portal Use: Qualitative Interview Study

Affiliations

Insights Into Older Adult Patient Concerns Around the Caregiver Proxy Portal Use: Qualitative Interview Study

Celine Latulipe et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Electronic patient portals have become common and offer many potential benefits for patients' self-management of health care. These benefits could be especially important for older adult patients dealing with significant chronic illness, many of whom have caregivers, such as a spouse, adult child, or other family member or friend, who help with health care management. Patient portals commonly contain large amounts of personal information, including diagnoses, health histories, medications, specialist appointments, lab results, and billing and insurance information. Some health care systems provide proxy accounts for caregivers to access a portal on behalf of a patient. It is not well known how much and in what way caregivers are using patient portals on behalf of patients and whether patients see any information disclosure risks associated with such access.

Objective: The objective of this study was to examine how older adult patients perceive the benefits and risks of proxy patient portal access by their caregivers.

Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 10 older adult patients with chronic illness. We asked them about their relationship with their caregivers, their use of their patient portal, their caregiver's use of the portal, and their perceptions about the benefits and risks of their caregiver's use of the portals. We also asked them about their comfort level with caregivers having access to information about a hypothetical diagnosis of a stigmatized condition. Two investigators conducted a thematic analysis of the qualitative data.

Results: All patients identified caregivers. Some had given caregivers access to their portals, in all cases by sharing log-in credentials, rather than by setting up an official proxy account. Patients generally saw benefits in their caregivers having access to the information and functions provided by the portal. Patients generally reported that they would be uncomfortable with caregivers learning of stigmatized conditions and also with caregivers (except spouses) accessing financial billing information.

Conclusions: Patients share their electronic patient portal credentials with caregivers to receive the benefits of those caregivers having access to important medical information but are unaware of all the information those caregivers can access. Better portal design could alleviate these unwanted information disclosures.

Keywords: caregivers; patient portals; proxy; proxy portal access; proxy portal accounts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gordon NP, Hornbrook MC. Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 04;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105. http://www.jmir.org/2016/3/e50/ v18i3e50 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Latulipe C, Gatto A, Nguyen HT, Miller DP, Quandt SA, Bertoni AG, Smith A, Arcury TA. Design Considerations for Patient Portal Adoption by Low-Income, Older Adults. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst; 33rd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2015 Apr 18; Seoul. New York, US: ACM; 2015. Apr, pp. 3859–3868. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27077140 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connelly K, ur Rehman Laghari K, Mokhtari Mounir, Falk Tiago H. Approaches to understanding the impact of technologies for aging in place: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2014;60(3):282–8. doi: 10.1159/000355644. https://www.karger.com?DOI=10.1159/000355644 000355644 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Goel MS, Brown TL, Williams A, Cooper AJ, Hasnain-Wynia R, Baker DW. Patient reported barriers to enrolling in a patient portal. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 2011;18(Supplement_1):8–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lyles C, Allen J, Poole D, Tieu L, Kanter M, Garrido T. “I Want to Keep the Personal Relationship With My Doctor”: Understanding Barriers to Portal Use among African Americans and Latinos. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016 Dec 03;18(10):e263. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5910. http://www.jmir.org/2016/10/e263/ v18i10e263 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types