Insights Into Older Adult Patient Concerns Around the Caregiver Proxy Portal Use: Qualitative Interview Study
- PMID: 30389654
- PMCID: PMC6240158
- DOI: 10.2196/10524
Insights Into Older Adult Patient Concerns Around the Caregiver Proxy Portal Use: Qualitative Interview Study
Abstract
Background: Electronic patient portals have become common and offer many potential benefits for patients' self-management of health care. These benefits could be especially important for older adult patients dealing with significant chronic illness, many of whom have caregivers, such as a spouse, adult child, or other family member or friend, who help with health care management. Patient portals commonly contain large amounts of personal information, including diagnoses, health histories, medications, specialist appointments, lab results, and billing and insurance information. Some health care systems provide proxy accounts for caregivers to access a portal on behalf of a patient. It is not well known how much and in what way caregivers are using patient portals on behalf of patients and whether patients see any information disclosure risks associated with such access.
Objective: The objective of this study was to examine how older adult patients perceive the benefits and risks of proxy patient portal access by their caregivers.
Methods: We conducted semistructured interviews with 10 older adult patients with chronic illness. We asked them about their relationship with their caregivers, their use of their patient portal, their caregiver's use of the portal, and their perceptions about the benefits and risks of their caregiver's use of the portals. We also asked them about their comfort level with caregivers having access to information about a hypothetical diagnosis of a stigmatized condition. Two investigators conducted a thematic analysis of the qualitative data.
Results: All patients identified caregivers. Some had given caregivers access to their portals, in all cases by sharing log-in credentials, rather than by setting up an official proxy account. Patients generally saw benefits in their caregivers having access to the information and functions provided by the portal. Patients generally reported that they would be uncomfortable with caregivers learning of stigmatized conditions and also with caregivers (except spouses) accessing financial billing information.
Conclusions: Patients share their electronic patient portal credentials with caregivers to receive the benefits of those caregivers having access to important medical information but are unaware of all the information those caregivers can access. Better portal design could alleviate these unwanted information disclosures.
Keywords: caregivers; patient portals; proxy; proxy portal access; proxy portal accounts.
©Celine Latulipe, Sara A. Quandt, Kathryn Altizer Melius, Alain Bertoni, David P. Miller Jr, Douglas Smith, Thomas A. Arcury. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 02.11.2018.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Similar articles
-
Security and Privacy Risks Associated With Adult Patient Portal Accounts in US Hospitals.JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Jun 1;180(6):845-849. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0515. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32364562 Free PMC article.
-
The Promise of Patient Portals for Individuals Living With Chronic Illness: Qualitative Study Identifying Pathways of Patient Engagement.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 17;22(7):e17744. doi: 10.2196/17744. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32706679 Free PMC article.
-
An Untapped Potential in Primary Care: Semi-Structured Interviews with Clinicians on How Patient Portals Will Work for Caregivers in the Safety Net.J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jul 20;22(7):e18466. doi: 10.2196/18466. J Med Internet Res. 2020. PMID: 32706709 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and Health Care Provider Perspectives on Patient Access to Test Results via Web Portals: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 19;25:e43765. doi: 10.2196/43765. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37856174 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient Portals to Support Care Partner Engagement in Adolescent and Adult Populations: A Scoping Review.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2248696. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48696. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 36576738 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Understanding Barriers and Design Opportunities to Improve Healthcare and QOL for Older Adults through Voice Assistants.ASSETS. 2021 Oct;2021:9. doi: 10.1145/3441852.3471218. Epub 2021 Oct 17. ASSETS. 2021. PMID: 39022668 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating Patient Use and Experience of Online Appointment Booking in Primary Care: Mixed Methods Study.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 8;26:e51931. doi: 10.2196/51931. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38976870 Free PMC article.
-
Patient Portals Fail to Collect Structured Information About Who Else is Involved in a Person's Care.J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jun 27;26:e49394. doi: 10.2196/49394. J Med Internet Res. 2024. PMID: 38935963 Free PMC article.
-
Care partners and consumer health information technology: A framework to guide systems-level initiatives in support of digital health equity.Learn Health Syst. 2024 Feb 27;8(Suppl 1):e10408. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10408. eCollection 2024 Jun. Learn Health Syst. 2024. PMID: 38883870 Free PMC article.
-
Psychiatrists' perceptions of conditions and consequences associated with the implementation of open notes: qualitative investigation.BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 10;24(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05845-6. BMC Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38858711 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Gordon NP, Hornbrook MC. Differences in Access to and Preferences for Using Patient Portals and Other eHealth Technologies Based on Race, Ethnicity, and Age: A Database and Survey Study of Seniors in a Large Health Plan. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Mar 04;18(3):e50. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5105. http://www.jmir.org/2016/3/e50/ v18i3e50 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Latulipe C, Gatto A, Nguyen HT, Miller DP, Quandt SA, Bertoni AG, Smith A, Arcury TA. Design Considerations for Patient Portal Adoption by Low-Income, Older Adults. Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst; 33rd annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2015 Apr 18; Seoul. New York, US: ACM; 2015. Apr, pp. 3859–3868. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/27077140 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Connelly K, ur Rehman Laghari K, Mokhtari Mounir, Falk Tiago H. Approaches to understanding the impact of technologies for aging in place: a mini-review. Gerontology. 2014;60(3):282–8. doi: 10.1159/000355644. https://www.karger.com?DOI=10.1159/000355644 000355644 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lyles C, Allen J, Poole D, Tieu L, Kanter M, Garrido T. “I Want to Keep the Personal Relationship With My Doctor”: Understanding Barriers to Portal Use among African Americans and Latinos. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2016 Dec 03;18(10):e263. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5910. http://www.jmir.org/2016/10/e263/ v18i10e263 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
