Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2019 Feb;57(2):251-259.
doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.507. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

Did a Goals-of-Care Discussion Happen? Differences in the Occurrence of Goals-of-Care Discussions as Reported by Patients, Clinicians, and in the Electronic Health Record

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Did a Goals-of-Care Discussion Happen? Differences in the Occurrence of Goals-of-Care Discussions as Reported by Patients, Clinicians, and in the Electronic Health Record

Matthew E Modes et al. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Feb.

Abstract

Context: Goals-of-care discussions are associated with improved end-of-life care for patients and therefore may be used as a process measure in quality improvement, research, and reimbursement programs.

Objectives: To examine three methods to assess occurrence of a goals-of-care discussion-patient report, clinician report, and documentation in the electronic health record (EHR)-at a clinic visit for seriously ill patients and determine whether each method is associated with patient-reported receipt of goal-concordant care.

Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter cluster-randomized trial, with 494 patients and 124 clinicians caring for them. Self-reported surveys collected from patients and clinicians two weeks after a clinic visit assessed occurrence of a goals-of-care discussion. Documentation of a goals-of-care discussion was abstracted from the EHR. Patient-reported receipt of goal-concordant care was assessed by survey two weeks after the visit.

Results: Fifty-two percent of patients reported occurrence of a goals-of-care discussion at the clinic visit; clinicians reported occurrence of a discussion at 66% of visits. EHR documentation occurred in 42% of visits (P < 0.001 for each compared with other two). Patients who reported occurrence of a goals-of-care discussion at the visit were more likely to report receipt of goal-concordant care than patients who reported no discussion (β 0.441, 95% CI 0.190-0.692; P = 0.001). Neither occurrence of a discussion by clinician report nor by EHR documentation was associated with goal-concordant care.

Conclusion: Different approaches to assess goals-of-care discussions give differing results, yet each may have advantages. Patient report is most likely to correlate with patient-reported receipt of goal-concordant care.

Keywords: Goals-of-care; end-of-life; palliative care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURES & CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

There are no disclosures or conflicts of interest from any of the authors.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.
Mosaic Plots of Occurrence of Goals-of-Care Discussions at Index Clinic Visit by Patient Report, Clinician Report, and EHR Documentationa a Based on 356 cases with valid data for all three information sources. Purple boxes represent concordant assessments. Gold boxes represent discordant assessments.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Detering KM, Hancock AD, Reade MC, Silvester W. The impact of advance care planning on end of life care in elderly patients: randomized controlled trial. BMJ 2010;340:c1345. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, et al. Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 2008;300(14):1665–73. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang B, Wright AA, Huskamp HH, et al. Health care costs in the last week of life: associations with end-of-life conversations. Arch Intern Med 2009;169(5)480–488. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2015. - PubMed
    1. National Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards: Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care - A Consensus Report. 2012. April. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2012/04/Palliative_Care_and_End.... Accessed June 18, 2018.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources