Did a Goals-of-Care Discussion Happen? Differences in the Occurrence of Goals-of-Care Discussions as Reported by Patients, Clinicians, and in the Electronic Health Record
- PMID: 30391656
- PMCID: PMC6348015
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.507
Did a Goals-of-Care Discussion Happen? Differences in the Occurrence of Goals-of-Care Discussions as Reported by Patients, Clinicians, and in the Electronic Health Record
Abstract
Context: Goals-of-care discussions are associated with improved end-of-life care for patients and therefore may be used as a process measure in quality improvement, research, and reimbursement programs.
Objectives: To examine three methods to assess occurrence of a goals-of-care discussion-patient report, clinician report, and documentation in the electronic health record (EHR)-at a clinic visit for seriously ill patients and determine whether each method is associated with patient-reported receipt of goal-concordant care.
Methods: We conducted a secondary analysis of a multicenter cluster-randomized trial, with 494 patients and 124 clinicians caring for them. Self-reported surveys collected from patients and clinicians two weeks after a clinic visit assessed occurrence of a goals-of-care discussion. Documentation of a goals-of-care discussion was abstracted from the EHR. Patient-reported receipt of goal-concordant care was assessed by survey two weeks after the visit.
Results: Fifty-two percent of patients reported occurrence of a goals-of-care discussion at the clinic visit; clinicians reported occurrence of a discussion at 66% of visits. EHR documentation occurred in 42% of visits (P < 0.001 for each compared with other two). Patients who reported occurrence of a goals-of-care discussion at the visit were more likely to report receipt of goal-concordant care than patients who reported no discussion (β 0.441, 95% CI 0.190-0.692; P = 0.001). Neither occurrence of a discussion by clinician report nor by EHR documentation was associated with goal-concordant care.
Conclusion: Different approaches to assess goals-of-care discussions give differing results, yet each may have advantages. Patient report is most likely to correlate with patient-reported receipt of goal-concordant care.
Keywords: Goals-of-care; end-of-life; palliative care.
Copyright © 2018 American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
DISCLOSURES & CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
There are no disclosures or conflicts of interest from any of the authors.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Effect of a Patient and Clinician Communication-Priming Intervention on Patient-Reported Goals-of-Care Discussions Between Patients With Serious Illness and Clinicians: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jul 1;178(7):930-940. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2317. JAMA Intern Med. 2018. PMID: 29802770 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of a Communication-Priming Intervention on Documented Goals-of-Care Discussions in Hospitalized Patients With Serious Illness: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e225088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5088. JAMA Netw Open. 2022. PMID: 35363271 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Improving communication about goals of care for hospitalized patients with serious illness: Study protocol for two complementary randomized trials.Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Sep;120:106879. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2022.106879. Epub 2022 Aug 10. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022. PMID: 35963531 Free PMC article.
-
Utilizing the Electronic Health Record to Improve Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review.Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018 Mar;35(3):532-541. doi: 10.1177/1049909117715217. Epub 2017 Jun 19. Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2018. PMID: 28627287 Review.
-
Communication Interventions to Improve Goal-Concordant Care of Seriously Ill Patients: An Integrative Review.J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2020 Feb;22(1):40-48. doi: 10.1097/NJH.0000000000000606. J Hosp Palliat Nurs. 2020. PMID: 31764395 Review.
Cited by
-
A conceptual model of the nurse's role as primary palliative care provider in goals of care communication.PEC Innov. 2024 Jan 12;4:100254. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100254. eCollection 2024 Dec. PEC Innov. 2024. PMID: 38298557 Free PMC article.
-
Quality and Satisfaction With Advance Care Planning Conversations Among English- and Spanish-Speaking Older Adults.J Palliat Med. 2023 Oct;26(10):1380-1385. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0565. Epub 2023 Jun 19. J Palliat Med. 2023. PMID: 37335910
-
Italian cross-cultural adaptation of the Quality of Communication questionnaire and the 4-item advance care planning engagement questionnaire.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 23;18(3):e0282960. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282960. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36952509 Free PMC article.
-
Serious Illness Conversation Training for Inpatient Medical Oncology Advanced Practice Providers: A Quality Improvement Project.J Adv Pract Oncol. 2023 Jan;14(1):37-48. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2023.14.1.3. Epub 2023 Feb 1. J Adv Pract Oncol. 2023. PMID: 36741212 Free PMC article.
-
Predictors of Documented Goals-of-Care Discussion for Hospitalized Patients With Chronic Illness.J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Mar;65(3):233-241. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.11.012. Epub 2022 Nov 22. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023. PMID: 36423800 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Institute of Medicine. Dying in America: Improving Quality and Honoring Individual Preferences Near the End of Life. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2015. - PubMed
-
- National Quality Forum. National Voluntary Consensus Standards: Palliative Care and End-of-Life Care - A Consensus Report. 2012. April. Available at: http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2012/04/Palliative_Care_and_End.... Accessed June 18, 2018.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
