Age at last screening and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer in older, unvaccinated, HPV-negative women: a modelling study
- PMID: 30392810
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30536-9
Age at last screening and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer in older, unvaccinated, HPV-negative women: a modelling study
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 1569-78.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):e10. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30924-0. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30614471 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: There is a paucity of empirical evidence to inform the age at which to stop cervical cancer screening. The recommended age to stop screening generally varies between age 50-70 years worldwide. However, cervical cancer incidence and mortality remain high in older women. We used a Markov model of cervical cancer screening to estimate the remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer at different ages and with different exit screening tests, with the aim of informing recommendations of the age at which to stop cervical cancer screening in developed countries.
Methods: For this modelling study, we developed a state transition (Markov) model of cervical cancer natural history and screening. We developed, calibrated, and validated our model using Canadian provincial registries and survey data. To simulate an age-structured population in the model, a new cohort of 236 564 women (one fifth of the population of Canadian women aged 20-24 years in 2012) entered the model every year and were successively modelled in parallel. Successive cohorts entered the model at age 10 years, creating an age-structured population of women aged 10-100 years. Women who had a total hysterectomy were excluded from the analyses. We calibrated our model to human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and cancer incidence with data from Statistics Canada, which compiles the data from 13 individual provincial registries. We chose a three-stage progressive cervical intraepithelial neoplasia model to include differences in management and treatment decisions depending on lesion severity. We modelled infections with four high-risk HPV groups: HPV16 and HPV18; HPV31, HPV33, HPV45, HPV52, and HPV58; HPV35, HPV39, HPV51, HPV56, HPV59, HPV66, and HPV68; and a generic group of other potentially oncogenic HPVs. We estimated 5-year, 10-year, and remaining lifetime risk of cervical cancer for older, unvaccinated women who stopped screening at different ages and underwent different screening tests.
Findings: Cervical cancer incidence excluding women with hysterectomies underestimated the incidence of cervical cancer in women with a cervix by up to 71% in women aged 80-84 years. Our model predicted that women without HPV vaccination who have been never screened have a 1 in 45 (95% percentile interval 1 in 32 to 1 in 64) lifetime risk of cervical cancer. Perfect adherence (100% of women screened) to cytology screening every 3 years between the ages of 25 years and 69 years could reduce the lifetime risk of cervical cancer to 1 in 532 women (95% percentile interval 1 in 375 to 1 in 820) without HPV vaccination. Increasing the age at which women stopped cytology screening from 55 years to 75 years led to incremental decreases in cancer risk later in life. A 70-year old woman whose screening history was unknown had an average remaining lifetime risk of 1 in 588 (<1%; 95% percentile interval 1 in 451 to 1 in 873) if she stopped screening. Her remaining lifetime risk at age 70 years was reduced to 1 in 1206 (2·0 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 942 to 1 in 1748) if she had a negative cytology test, 1 in 6525 (12·9 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 3167 to 1 in 18 664) if she had a negative HPV test, and 1 in 9550 (18·1 times reduction; 95% percentile interval 1 in 4928 to 1 in 23 228) if she had a negative co-test for cytology and HPV.
Interpretation: Cervical cancer risk reductions might be achieved by screening with cytology up to age 75 years, although with diminishing returns. A negative exit oncogenic HPV test or negative HPV test plus cytology correlates with a low remaining lifetime cervical cancer risk for unvaccinated women with a cervix after the age of 55 years.
Funding: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Evidence-based screening protocols for cervical cancer?Lancet Oncol. 2018 Dec;19(12):1544-1545. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30587-4. Epub 2018 Nov 1. Lancet Oncol. 2018. PMID: 30392808 No abstract available.
-
Limitations of simulation models for cervical cancer screening.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):e68. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30011-7. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30712801 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Limitations of simulation models for cervical cancer screening - Authors' reply.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):e69. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30012-9. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30712802 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The clinical utility of extended high-risk HPV genotyping in risk-stratifying women with L-SIL cytology: A retrospective study of 8726 cases.Cancer Cytopathol. 2022 Jul;130(7):542-550. doi: 10.1002/cncy.22573. Epub 2022 Mar 21. Cancer Cytopathol. 2022. PMID: 35312217
-
Primary HPV testing versus cytology-based cervical screening in women in Australia vaccinated for HPV and unvaccinated: effectiveness and economic assessment for the National Cervical Screening Program.Lancet Public Health. 2017 Feb;2(2):e96-e107. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30007-5. Epub 2017 Feb 7. Lancet Public Health. 2017. PMID: 29253402
-
The projected timeframe until cervical cancer elimination in Australia: a modelling study.Lancet Public Health. 2019 Jan;4(1):e19-e27. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(18)30183-X. Epub 2018 Oct 2. Lancet Public Health. 2019. PMID: 30291040
-
Screening for Cervical Cancer: A Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 May. Report No.: 11-05157-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2011 May. Report No.: 11-05157-EF-1. PMID: 22553886 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Are 20 human papillomavirus types causing cervical cancer?J Pathol. 2014 Dec;234(4):431-5. doi: 10.1002/path.4424. J Pathol. 2014. PMID: 25124771 Review.
Cited by
-
Prevalence and genotype distribution of human papillomavirus infection among 66000 women from 2014 to 2023 in the plateau region of Southwest China.Virol J. 2024 Aug 6;21(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12985-024-02447-2. Virol J. 2024. PMID: 39107796 Free PMC article.
-
Questionnaire survey on cervical cancer screening and HPV awareness among patients at a local cancer center in Japan.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Jul 16;24(1):402. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03256-z. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 39014425 Free PMC article.
-
Human Papilloma Virus Infection and Gene Subtypes Analysis in Women Undergoing Physical Examinations: A 2015-2020 Study in Wenzhou, China.Cancer Control. 2024 Jan-Dec;31:10732748241257902. doi: 10.1177/10732748241257902. Cancer Control. 2024. PMID: 38783796 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of secular trends of three major gynecologic cancers burden and attributable risk factors from 1990 to 2019: an age period cohort analysis.BMC Public Health. 2024 May 19;24(1):1349. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18858-3. BMC Public Health. 2024. PMID: 38764017 Free PMC article.
-
Value of a catch-up HPV test in women aged 65 and above: A Danish population-based nonrandomized intervention study.PLoS Med. 2023 Jul 6;20(7):e1004253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004253. eCollection 2023 Jul. PLoS Med. 2023. PMID: 37410699 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
