Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;37(1):11-19.
doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000484.

Usability Evaluation of a Dashboard for Home Care Nurses

Affiliations

Usability Evaluation of a Dashboard for Home Care Nurses

Dawn Dowding et al. Comput Inform Nurs. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

The introduction of electronic health records has produced many challenges for clinicians. These include integrating technology into clinical workflow and fragmentation of relevant information across systems. Dashboards, which use visualized data to summarize key patient information, have the potential to address these issues. In this article, we outline a usability evaluation of a dashboard designed for home care nurses. An iterative design process was used, which consisted of (1) contextual inquiry (observation and interviews) with two home care nurses; (2) rapid feedback on paper prototypes of the dashboard (10 nurses); and (3) usability evaluation of the final dashboard prototype (20 nurses). Usability methods and assessments included observation of nurses interacting with the dashboard, the system usability scale, and the Questionnaire for User Interaction Satisfaction short form. The dashboard prototype was deemed to have high usability (mean system usability scale, 73.2 [SD, 18.8]) and was positively evaluated by nurse users. It is important to ensure that technology solutions such as the one proposed in this article are designed with clinical users in mind, to meet their information needs. The design elements of the dashboard outlined in this article could be translated to other electronic health records used in home care settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1:
Figure 1:
Example of prototype dashboard display

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Charles D, Gabriel M, Searcy T. Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems among U.S. NonFederal Acute Care Hospitals: 2008–2014 Washington, DC: Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; 2015.
    1. Bercovitz AR, Park-Lee E, Jamoom E. Adoption and Use of Electronic Health Records and Mobile Technology by Home Health and Hospice Care Agencies. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics, 2013. - PubMed
    1. Davis JA, Zakoscielna K, Jacobs L. Electronic Information Systems Use in Residential Care Facilities: The Differential Effect of Ownership Status and Chain Affiliation. Journal of Applied Gerontology. 2016;35(3):331–48. - PubMed
    1. Council NR. Computational Technology for Effective Health Care: Immediate Steps and Strategic Directions. Stead WW, Lin HS, editors. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009. 120 p. - PubMed
    1. Armijo D, McDonnell C, Werner K. Electronic Health Record Usability: Interface Design Considerations. Rockville, MD: October 2009.

Publication types