Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
, 27 (8), 2568-2576

Tunnel Placement in ACL Reconstruction Surgery: Smaller Inter-Tunnel Angles and Higher Peak Forces at the Femoral Tunnel Using Anteromedial Portal Femoral Drilling-A 3D and Finite Element Analysis

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Tunnel Placement in ACL Reconstruction Surgery: Smaller Inter-Tunnel Angles and Higher Peak Forces at the Femoral Tunnel Using Anteromedial Portal Femoral Drilling-A 3D and Finite Element Analysis

Thomas Tampere et al. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc.

Abstract

Purpose: Recent studies have emphasized the importance of anatomical ACL reconstruction to restore normal knee kinematics and stability. Aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the ability of the anteromedial (AM) and transtibial (TT) techniques for ACL reconstruction to achieve anatomical placement of the femoral and tibial tunnel within the native ACL footprint and to determine forces within the graft during functional motion. As the AM technique is nowadays the technique of choice, the hypothesis is that there are significant differences in tunnel features, reaction forces and/or moments within the graft when compared to the TT technique.

Methods: Twenty ACL-deficient patients were allocated to reconstruction surgery with one of both techniques. Postoperatively, all patients underwent a computed tomography scan (CT) allowing 3D reconstruction to analyze tunnel geometry and tunnel placement within the native ACL footprint. A patient-specific finite element analysis (FEA) was conducted to determine reaction forces and moments within the graft during antero-posterior translation and pivot-shift motion.

Results: With significantly shorter femoral tunnels (p < 0.001) and a smaller inter-tunnel angle (p < 0.001), the AM technique places tunnels with less variance, close to the anatomical centre of the ACL footprints when compared to the TT technique. Using the latter, tibial tunnels were more medialised (p = 0.007) with a higher position of the femoral tunnels (p = 0.02). FEA showed the occurrence of higher, but non-significant, reaction forces in the graft, especially on the femoral side and lower, however, statistically not significant, reaction moments using the AM technique.

Conclusion: This study indicates important, technique-dependent differences in tunnel features with changes in reaction forces and moments within the graft.

Level of evidence: II.

Keywords: 3D; Anterior cruciate ligament; Anteromedial; FEA; Footprint; Reconstruction; Transtibial.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Aug;33(8):1166-73 - PubMed
    1. Arthroscopy. 2008 May;24(5):585-92 - PubMed
    1. J Biomech Eng. 2009 Dec;131(12):121007 - PubMed
    1. Am J Sports Med. 2011 Feb;39(2):272-8 - PubMed
    1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012 Aug;20(8):1584-93 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback