Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec:120:14-19.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

Challenges optimizing the after visit summary

Affiliations

Challenges optimizing the after visit summary

Alex Federman et al. Int J Med Inform. 2018 Dec.

Abstract

Background: The after visit summary (AVS) is a paper or electronic document given to patients after a medical appointment, which is intended to summarize patients' health and guide future care, including self-management tasks.

Objective: To describe experiences of health systems implementing a redesigned outpatient AVS in commercially available electronic health record (EHR) systems to inform future optimization.

Materials and methods: We conducted semi-structured interviews with information technology and clinical leaders at 12 hospital and community-based healthcare institutions across the continental United States focusing on the process of AVS redesign and implementation. We also report our experience implementing a redesigned AVS in the Epic EHR at the Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City, NY.

Results: Health systems experienced many challenges implementing the redesigned AVS. While many IT leaders noted that the redesigned AVS is easier to understand and the document is better organized, they claim the effort is time-consuming, Epic system upgrades render AVS modifications non-functional, and primary care and specialty practices have different needs in regards to content and formatting. Our team was able to modify the document by changing the order of print groups, modifying the font size, bolding section headers, and inserting page breaks. Similar to other health systems, our team found that it is difficult to achieve some desired features due to limitations in the EHR platform.

Conclusion: Health IT leaders view the AVS as a valuable source of information for patients. However, limitations to AVS modifications in EHR systems present challenges to optimizing the tool. EHR vendors should incorporate learning from healthcare systems innovation efforts and consider building more flexibility into their product development.

Keywords: After visit summary (AVS); Electronic health record (EHR); Implementation; Redesign.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Watson PW, McKinstry B, A systematic review of interventions to improve recall of medical advice in healthcare consultations (in eng), J. R. Soc. Med 102 (June (6)) (2009) 235–243. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ellis DA, Hopkin JM, Leitch AG, Crofton J, Doctors’ orders”: controlled trial of supplementary, written information for patients (in eng), Br. Med. J 1 (February (6161)) (1979) 456. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Maly RC, Bourque LB, Engelhardt RF, A randomized controlled trial of facilitating information giving to patients with chronic medical conditions: effects on outcomes of care (in eng), J. Fam. Pract. 48 (May (5)) (1999) 356–363. - PubMed
    1. Asch R, Price J, Hawks G, Psychiatric out-patients’ reactions to summary letters of their consultations (in eng), Br. J. Med. Psychol 64 (March (Pt. 1)) (1991) 3–9. - PubMed
    1. Damian D, Tattersall MH, Letters to patients: improving communication in cancer care (in eng), Lancet 338 (October (8772)) (1991) 923–925. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms