Choosing between ticagrelor and clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis (2007-2017)
- PMID: 30412125
- PMCID: PMC6221558
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012978
Choosing between ticagrelor and clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and Meta-Analysis (2007-2017)
Abstract
Background: Limitations have been observed with the use of clopidogrel following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) indicating the urgent need of a more potent anti-platelet agent. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel following PCI.
Methods: Online databases were searched for relevant studies (published between the years 2007 and 2017) comparing ticagrelor versus clopidogrel following coronary stenting. Primary outcomes assessed efficacy whereas secondary outcomes assessed safety. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on a random effect model were calculated and the analysis was carried out by the RevMan 5.3 software.
Results: A total number of 25,632 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) [12,992 patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 14,215 patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI)] were included in this analysis, of whom 23,714 patients were revascularized by PCI. Results of this analysis did not show any significant difference in all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), myocardial infarction, stroke and stent thrombosis observed between ticagrelor and clopidogrel with (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.67-1.03; P = .09), (OR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.41-1.01; P = .06), (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.57-1.03; P = .08), (OR: 0.85, 95% CI: 0.57-1.26; P = .42) and (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.47-1.05; P =.09).However, ticagrelor was associated with a significantly higher minor and major bleeding with (OR: 1.57, 95% CI: 1.30-1.89; P = .00001) and (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.01-2.29; P = 0.04) respectively. Dyspnea was also significantly higher in the ticagrelor group (OR: 2.64, 95% CI: 1.87-3.72; P = .00001).
Conclusion: Ticagrelor and clopidogrel were comparable in terms of efficacy in these patients with ACS. However, the safety outcomes of ticagrelor should further be investigated.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Assessment of Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel Treatment in Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;68(2):115-20. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000000390. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2016. PMID: 27010809 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of the Effects of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel on Inflammatory Factors, Vascular Endothelium Functions and Short-Term Prognosis in Patients with Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Emergency Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a Pilot Study.Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;48(1):385-396. doi: 10.1159/000491768. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018. PMID: 30016801
-
Angiographic outcomes in the PLATO Trial (Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes).JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Jul;6(7):671-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.03.014. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013. PMID: 23866179 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of clopidogrel and potent P2Y 12 -inhibitors on mortality and stroke in patients with acute coronary syndrome or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jan;109(1):93-101. doi: 10.1160/TH12-06-0377. Epub 2012 Nov 29. Thromb Haemost. 2013. PMID: 23197191 Review.
-
Prasugrel (Efient®) with percutaneous coronary intervention for treating acute coronary syndromes (review of TA182): systematic review and economic analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2015 Apr;19(29):1-130. doi: 10.3310/hta19290. Health Technol Assess. 2015. PMID: 25896573 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Comparison of clopidogrel and ticagrelor in treating acute coronary syndrome undergoing PCI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Heliyon. 2024 Feb 22;10(5):e26553. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26553. eCollection 2024 Mar 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 38455558 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Elective Coronary Stenting: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.J Interv Cardiol. 2023 Dec 26;2023:5544440. doi: 10.1155/2023/5544440. eCollection 2023. J Interv Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 38170033 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity in Patients Undergoing Complex Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231199089. doi: 10.1177/10760296231199089. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023. PMID: 37697705 Free PMC article.
-
Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies.Health Technol Assess. 2023 May;27(8):1-257. doi: 10.3310/MNJY9014. Health Technol Assess. 2023. PMID: 37435838 Free PMC article.
-
An Examination of Clopidogrel in the Treatment of Coronary Microvascular Disease.Cureus. 2022 Aug 25;14(8):e28406. doi: 10.7759/cureus.28406. eCollection 2022 Aug. Cureus. 2022. PMID: 36171852 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Emmanouil S, Brilakis, Vishal G, et al. Medical management after coronary stent implantation: a review. JAMA 2013;310:189–98. - PubMed
-
- Galper BZ, Mauri L. Antiplatelet therapy after coronary stenting. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2013;15:1–0. - PubMed
-
- Bundhun PK, Teeluck AR, Bhurtu A, et al. Is the concomitant use of clopidogrel and Proton Pump Inhibitors still associated with increased adverse cardiovascular outcomes following coronary angioplasty?: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recently published studies (2012–2016). BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2017;17:3. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Kang HJ, Clare AM, Gao R, et al. PLATO investigators. ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome: A retrospective analysis from the platelet inhibition and patient outcomes (PLATO) trial. Am Heart J 2015;169:899–905. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
