Effect of Aging on Cortical Current Flow Due to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Considerations for Safety
- PMID: 30441046
- DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2018.8513014
Effect of Aging on Cortical Current Flow Due to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Considerations for Safety
Abstract
While intracranial volume is thought to be fixed throughout the lifespan, there is little doubt that the brain shrinks with age and it is most precipitous after about the age of 50. This as a consequence reflects an increase in cranial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) with age. Of the myriad factors influencing brain current flow, these changes in CSF volume are expected to play a profound role given its high electrical conductivity. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of agerelated morphological changes on brain current flow patterns due to transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Anatomical MRI data were collected for 5 healthy subjects spanning 5 decades of life (ages: 43 to 85). Finite element models derived from the MRI were used to calculate cortical electrical field values during tDCS. The widely used C3-Fp2 (M1-SO) and the F3-F4 montage along with two High Definition-tDCS electrode montages 4X1 (C3-centered) and 4X1 (F3-centered) were simulated. Peak induced electrical field at the intended brain target (assumed to be directly underneath the electrode) and at non-intended brain regions was compared with the individual brain atrophy coefficients. Findings across 4 subjects (ages: 43 to 75) indicate reduced peak electrical field with increasing age. However, this trend reverses for the oldest subject. While age-related morphological changes lead to significant changes in current flow distribution, they are not substantially different than younger adults. The predictions of this study are the first step to assess safety of tDCS in elderly subjects and provide a rational path in customizing stimulation dose for trials involving them.
Similar articles
-
Influence of gender-related differences in transcranial direct current stimulation: A Computational Study.Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019 Jul;2019:5196-5199. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2019.8856898. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2019. PMID: 31947029
-
The electric field distributions in anatomical head models during transcranial direct current stimulation for post-stroke rehabilitation.Med Phys. 2017 Jan;44(1):262-271. doi: 10.1002/mp.12006. Epub 2017 Jan 3. Med Phys. 2017. PMID: 28044315
-
Modelling the effect of electrode displacement on transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS).J Neural Eng. 2018 Feb;15(1):016019. doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aa8d8a. J Neural Eng. 2018. PMID: 28925375
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: an update in electric field modeling and investigations for optimal electrode montage.Expert Rev Neurother. 2019 Oct;19(10):1025-1035. doi: 10.1080/14737175.2019.1637257. Epub 2019 Jul 8. Expert Rev Neurother. 2019. PMID: 31244347 Review.
-
Transcranial direct current stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder: emerging clinical evidence and considerations for optimal montage of electrodes.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015 Jul;12(4):381-91. doi: 10.1586/17434440.2015.1037832. Epub 2015 May 17. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015. PMID: 25982412 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Potential of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: Optimizing Trials Toward Clinical Use.J Clin Neurol. 2022 Jul;18(4):391-400. doi: 10.3988/jcn.2022.18.4.391. J Clin Neurol. 2022. PMID: 35796264 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sex difference in tDCS current mediated by changes in cortical anatomy: A study across young, middle and older adults.Brain Stimul. 2022 Jan-Feb;15(1):125-140. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.018. Epub 2021 Nov 23. Brain Stimul. 2022. PMID: 34826627 Free PMC article.
-
A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to Remediate Age-Related Cognitive Decline in Healthy Older Adults.Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021 Mar 29;17:971-990. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S259499. eCollection 2021. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021. PMID: 33824591 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Age-Related EEG Power Reductions Cannot Be Explained by Changes of the Conductivity Distribution in the Head Due to Brain Atrophy.Front Aging Neurosci. 2021 Feb 18;13:632310. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2021.632310. eCollection 2021. Front Aging Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33679380 Free PMC article.
-
Age as a Mediator of tDCS Effects on Pain: An Integrative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Front Hum Neurosci. 2020 Oct 28;14:568306. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.568306. eCollection 2020. Front Hum Neurosci. 2020. PMID: 33192397 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous