Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2018 Oct 31;7:F1000 Faculty Rev-1726.
doi: 10.12688/f1000research.16157.1. eCollection 2018.

Clinical management of herpes simplex virus infections: past, present, and future

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Clinical management of herpes simplex virus infections: past, present, and future

Richard Whitley et al. F1000Res. .
Free PMC article

Abstract

Infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV) types 1 and 2 is ubiquitous in the human population. Most commonly, virus replication is limited to the epithelia and establishes latency in enervating sensory neurons, reactivating periodically to produce localized recurrent lesions. However, these viruses can also cause severe disease such as recurrent keratitis leading potentially to blindness, as well as encephalitis, and systemic disease in neonates and immunocompromised patients. Although antiviral therapy has allowed continual and substantial improvement in the management of both primary and recurrent infections, resistance to currently available drugs and long-term toxicity pose a current and future threat that should be addressed through the development of new antiviral compounds directed against new targets. The development of several promising HSV vaccines has been terminated recently because of modest or controversial therapeutic effects in humans. Nevertheless, several exciting vaccine candidates remain in the pipeline and are effective in animal models; these must also be tested in humans for sufficient therapeutic effects to warrant continued development. Approaches using compounds that modulate the chromatin state of the viral genome to suppress infection and reactivation or induce enhanced antiviral immunity have potential. In addition, technologies such as CRISPR/Cas9 have the potential to edit latent viral DNA in sensory neurons, potentially curing the neuron and patient of latent infection. It is hoped that development on all three fronts-antivirals, vaccines, and gene editing-will lead to substantially less HSV morbidity in the future.

Keywords: CRISPR/Cas9; HSV-1; HSV-2; Herpes encephalitis; Herpes simplex virus; antiviral compounds; vaccine.

Conflict of interest statement

No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.No competing interests were disclosed.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Roizman B, Knipe D, Whitley R: Herpes Simplex Viruses. In Knipe D, Howley P (ed), Fields Virology,LWW, Philadelphia.2013;2:1823–1897.
    1. Roizman B, Whitley RJ: The nine ages of herpes simplex virus. Herpes. 2001;8(1):23–7. - PubMed
    1. McQuillan G, Kruszon-Moran D, Flagg EW, et al. : Prevalence of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 and Type 2 in Persons Aged 14-49: United States, 2015-2016. NCHS Data Brief. 2018; (304):1–8. - PubMed
    2. F1000 Recommendation

    1. Xu F, Sternberg MR, Kottiri BJ, et al. : Trends in herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 seroprevalence in the United States. JAMA. 2006;296(8):964–73. 10.1001/jama.296.8.964 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roberts CM, Pfister JR, Spear SJ: Increasing proportion of herpes simplex virus type 1 as a cause of genital herpes infection in college students. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30(10):797–800. 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000092387.58746.C7 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Grant support

This piece was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health – Public Health Service.