In the present study, we aimed to clarify predictive factors that may cause postoperative infectious complications after flexible ureterorenoscopy (f-URS). In a 4-year prospective study, charts of patients who underwent f-URS between January 2014 and January 2018 for renal stone(s) in a tertiary academic center were reviewed. A standardized f-URS procedure was performed for all patients. Post-operative infectious complications including fever, sepsis and septic shock were categorized into same group. Patients with and without infectious complications were compared in the terms of preoperative, operative and post operative characteristics. In total, 463 patients who did not face infectious complications and 31 patients who faced infectious complications were enrolled into the study. The mean age was significantly lower in patients who did face infectious complications (34.8 vs 44.7 years old, p < 0.001). On the other hand, presence of renal abnormality was significantly more common in patients with infectious complications (12.3% vs 35.5%, p < 0.001). The mean operation time was 65.3 min in patients with infectious complications and significantly longer when compared with patients who did not face infectious complication (47.8 min, p < 0.001). Stone-free rate was significantly higher in patients without infectious complications (85.3% vs 77.5, p = 0.009). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that longer operation time ≥ 60 min, presence of renal abnormality and age ≤ 40 years were predictive factors for infectious complications following f-URS. The present study has demonstrated that operation time ≥ 60 min, presence of renal abnormality and patients with ≤ 40 years were significantly associated with infectious complications following f-URS.
Keywords: Complication; Fever; Flexible ureterorenoscopy; Infectious; Sepsis.
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Renal and Proximal Ureteral Stone in Patients With Previous Ureteral Stenting: Impact on Stone-Free Rate and MorbidityJF Dessyn et al. J Endourol 30 (10), 1084-1088. PMID 27527667.Technical aspects of the f-URS procedure were not modified by ureteral stenting. We found that f-URS in patients with ureteral stenting was not associated with a better S …
Comparison of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy and Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Management of Multiple Renal Calculi in 10-30 Mm SizeF Yanaral et al. Urol J 16 (4), 326-330. PMID 30334245.Our study demonstrated that f-URS and mini-perc were effective treatment options for multiple renal stones 10-30 mm in size. However, f-URS was associated with a signific …
Comparison of the Efficacy and Morbidity of Flexible Ureterorenoscopy for Lower Pole Stones Compared With Other Renal LocationsB Jacquemet et al. J Endourol 28 (10), 1183-7. PMID 24811281.In our study, stone location, in particular LPS, did not have any impact on efficacy and morbidity of f-URS. Only multiple locations and stone size >10 mm seemed to si …
Flexible Ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) With Holmium Laser Versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) for Treatment of Renal Stone <2 Cm: A Meta-AnalysisY Mi et al. Urolithiasis 44 (4), 353-65. PMID 26530230. - ReviewThe objective of the study was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave l …
Impact of Ureteral Stenting Prior to Ureterorenoscopy on Stone-Free Rates and ComplicationsPP Lumma et al. World J Urol 31 (4), 855-9. PMID 22037634. - ReviewStent placement prior to ureteroscopic stone treatment in distal ureter is not reasonable and does not considerably improve stone-free rates.