Introduction: Constraints on surgical resident training (work-hour mandates, shorter training programs, etc.) and availability of expert surgical educators may limit the acquisition of prosthetic surgical skills. As a result, training courses are being conducted to augment the prosthetic surgery learning experience.
Aim: To evaluate the impact of a hands-on cadaver-based teaching program on resident procedural knowledge and procedural confidence with placement of a penile prosthesis.
Main outcome measure: Changes in procedural knowledge and self-confidence following a focused training program on penile prosthetics.
Methods: As part of the 2017 Society of Urologic Prosthetic Surgeons and the Sexual Medicine Society of North America Annual Meeting, 31 urology residents participated in a simulation lab in prosthetic urology. The lab included didactic lectures and a hands-on cadaveric laboratory. Participants completed surveys before and after the course. Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests for matched pairs were used to compare respondents' pre- and postcourse knowledge (% questions answered correctly) and confidence ratings. Prior implant experience was assessed.
Results: 31 residents participated in this study. The majority of the participants were 4th- (41.9%) and 5th-year residents (38.7%). Participants showed a significant improvement in procedural knowledge test scores (68.8±13.4 vs 74.2 ± 13.0, P < .05) and self-reported increased median surgical confidence levels (4 vs 3, P value < .001) after completion of the cadaveric course. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that residents with prosthetic surgery experience of <10 cases benefited the most. In addition, improvement in surgical confidence levels observed was greater than the improvement in surgical knowledge. The overall cost of the simulation training course was approximately $1,483 per resident.
Conclusion: Simulation training in prosthetic surgery seems to improve surgical confidence and knowledge. Further research is needed to better understand the benefits and limitations of simulation training. Lentz AC, Rodríguez D, Davis LG. Simulation training in penile implant surgery: Assessment of surgical confidence and knowledge with cadaveric laboratory training. Sex Med 2018;6:332-338.
Keywords: Erectile Dysfunction; Penile Implant; Resident Education; Simulation.
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Feasibility and Benefit of Incorporating a Multimedia Cadaver Laboratory Training Program into a Didactics Curriculum for Junior and Senior Surgical Residents.J Surg Educ. 2018 Sep-Oct;75(5):1188-1194. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.03.012. Epub 2018 Apr 18. J Surg Educ. 2018. PMID: 29678532
Expert training with standardized operative technique helps establish a successful penile prosthetics program for urologic resident education.J Sex Med. 2011 Oct;8(10):2726-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2011.02418.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3. J Sex Med. 2011. PMID: 21812936
A novel cadaveric simulation program in urology.J Surg Educ. 2015 Jul-Aug;72(4):556-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.01.005. Epub 2015 Feb 13. J Surg Educ. 2015. PMID: 25683152
Cadaver-Based Simulation Increases Resident Confidence, Initial Exposure to Fundamental Techniques, and May Augment Operative Autonomy.J Surg Educ. 2016 Nov-Dec;73(6):e33-e41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Jul 31. J Surg Educ. 2016. PMID: 27488813 Review.
Virtual reality training for improving the skills needed for performing surgery of the ear, nose or throat.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 9;(9):CD010198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010198.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015. PMID: 26352008 Review.
Cited by 1 article
Novel Education and Simulation Tools in Urologic Training.Curr Urol Rep. 2019 Nov 28;20(12):81. doi: 10.1007/s11934-019-0947-8. Curr Urol Rep. 2019. PMID: 31782033 Review.
- Damadi A., Davis A.T., Saxe A. ACGME duty-hour restrictions decrease resident operative volume: A 5-year comparison at an ACGME-accredited university general surgery residency. J Surg Educ. 2007;64:256–259. - PubMed
- Kamine T.H., Gondek S., Kent T.S. Decrease in junior resident case volume after 2011 ACGME work hours. J Surg Educ. 2014;71:e59–e63. - PubMed
- Kneebone R.L. Practice, rehearsal, and performance: An approach for simulation-based surgical and procedure training. JAMA. 2009;302:1336–1338. - PubMed
- Stegemann A.P., Ahmed K., Syed J.R. Fundamental skills of robotic surgery: A multi-institutional randomized controlled trial for validation of a simulation-based curriculum. Urology. 2013;81:767–774. - PubMed