Comparison of a Smartphone Otoscope and Conventional Otoscope in the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Otitis Media

Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2019 Mar;58(3):302-306. doi: 10.1177/0009922818812480. Epub 2018 Nov 21.

Abstract

Acute otitis media (AOM) is a leading cause of health encounters and antimicrobial prescriptions in children worldwide. We assessed (1) the rates of antimicrobial prescribing by pediatric emergency department clinicians using a smartphone otoscope device as compared with a conventional otoscope and (2) clinician acceptability of the smartphone device. We conducted a randomized control study in children's hospital emergency departments over 6 months. More than 1500 encounters were analyzed. The odds of prescribing antibiotics after being given a diagnosis of AOM by clinicians assigned to the smartphone group was 11% higher than the conventional group (18.8% vs 18.0%, odds ratio = 1.106, P = .600). Eight (73%) of the 11 physicians in the smartphone group preferred the smartphone device over the conventional otoscope. Use of a smartphone otoscope for detection of AOM in a pediatric emergency department setting did not lead to an increased likelihood of AOM diagnosis.

Keywords: acute otitis media; emergency medicine; medical technology; otoscope; pediatrics.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Child, Preschool
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Otitis Media / diagnosis*
  • Otitis Media / drug therapy*
  • Otoscopes*
  • Pediatrics / methods
  • Prospective Studies
  • Smartphone*

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents