Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan;56(1):66-73.
doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

Lung Cancer Screening Inconsistent With U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

Affiliations

Lung Cancer Screening Inconsistent With U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations

Thomas B Richards et al. Am J Prev Med. 2019 Jan.

Abstract

Introduction: Prior studies suggest overuse of nonrecommended lung cancer screening tests in U.S. community practice and underuse of recommended tests.

Methods: Data from the 2010 and 2015 National Health Interview Surveys was analyzed from 2016 to 2018. Prevalence, populations, and number of chest computed tomography (CT) and chest x-ray tests were estimated for people who did and did not meet U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) criteria for lung cancer screening, among people aged ≥40 years without lung cancer.

Results: In 2015, among those who met USPSTF criteria, 4.4% (95% CI=3.0%, 6.6%), or 360,000 (95% CI=240,000, 535,000) people reported lung cancer screening with a chest CT; and 8.5% (95% CI=6.5%, 11.1%), or 689,000 (95% CI=526,000, 898,000) people reported a chest x ray. Among those who did not meet USPSTF criteria, 2.3% (95% CI=2.0%, 2.6%), or 3,259,000 (95% CI=2,850,000, 3,724,000) people reported a chest x ray; and 1.3% (95% CI=1.1%, 1.5%), or 1,806,000 (95% CI=1,495,000, 2,173,000) people reported a chest CT. The estimated population meeting USPSTF criteria for lung cancer screening in 2015 was 8,098,000 (95% CI=7,533,000, 8,702,000), which was smaller than the 9,620,000 people (95% CI=8,960,000, 10,325,000) in 2010.

Conclusions: The number of adults inappropriately screened for lung cancer greatly exceeds the number screened according to USPSTF recommendations, the prevalence of appropriate lung cancer screening is low, and the population meeting USPSTF criteria is shrinking. To realize the potential benefits of screening, better processes to appropriately triage eligible individuals to screening, plus screening with a USPSTF-recommended test, would be beneficial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Population estimates for adults who reported lung cancer screening, 2010 and 2015.a aRespondents are adults aged ≥ 40 years without lung cancer. Estimates are rounded to nearest million. Lung cancer screening categories are not mutually exclusive. CT, computed tomography; USPSTF, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. National Lung Screening Trial Research Team, Aberle DR, Adams AM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409. 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klabunde CN, Marcus PM, Silvestri GA, et al. U.S. primary care physicians’ lung cancer screening beliefs and recommendations. Am J Prev Med. 2010;39(5):411–420. 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.07.004. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oken MM, Hocking WG, Kvale PA, et al. Screening by chest radio-graph and lung cancer mortality: the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;306(17):1865–1873. 10.1001/jama.2011.1591. - DOI - PubMed
    1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Lung cancer: screening. Recommendation summary. www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org. Published 2013. Accessed July 9, 2018.
    1. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Decision Memo for Screening for Lung Cancer with Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) (CAG-00439N). www.cms.gov/medicare-coverage-database/details/nca-decision-memo.aspx?NC.... Published 2015. Accessed July 9, 2018.

Publication types

MeSH terms