Background: There is growing interest in using technology-based tools to support mental health recovery. Yet, despite evidence suggesting widespread access to technology among people with mental illnesses, interest in using technology to support mental health, and effectiveness of technology-based tools developed by researchers, such tools have not been widely adopted within mental health settings. Little is currently known about how mental health consumers are using technology to address mental health needs in real-world settings outside of controlled research studies.
Objective: This qualitative study examined current practices and orientations toward technology among consumers in 3 mental health settings in the United States.
Methods: Ethnographic observations and semistructured interviews were conducted. Observations focused on if and how technology was salient within the setting and documented relevant behaviors, interactions, and dialogue in fieldnotes. Ethnographic data informed the development of a semistructured interview that inquired into technology use and interest among consumers (n=15) in a community mental health setting. Fieldnotes and interview transcripts were reviewed and coded by multiple researchers. Key concepts and patterns identified were refined by the research team to develop the main findings.
Results: Ownership of technology, although common, was not ubiquitous and was varied across the sites. Participants had varying levels of awareness regarding the key capabilities of modern technologies. Participants used technology for many purposes, but there was limited evidence of technology use to support mental health. Technology-based tools specific to mental health were not routinely used, although some participants found widely available mobile apps to be helpful in recovery.
Conclusions: Qualitative findings suggest that many, but not all, clients will be interested in using technology to support mental health needs. The variability in type and quality of technology owned by participants suggests the need to design for a range of functionality in the development of mental health tools. Findings also suggest thinking broadly about using existing platforms and widely available tools to support consumers in mental health recovery.
Keywords: mental health; mobile phone; qualitative research; technology.
©Elizabeth Carpenter-Song, Valerie A Noel, Stephanie C Acquilano, Robert E Drake. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 23.11.2018.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Implementation of a Substance Use Recovery Support Mobile Phone App in Community Settings: Qualitative Study of Clinician and Staff Perspectives of Facilitators and Barriers.JMIR Ment Health. 2016 Jun 28;3(2):e24. doi: 10.2196/mental.4927. JMIR Ment Health. 2016. PMID: 27352884 Free PMC article.
Is India ready for mental health apps (MHApps)? A quantitative-qualitative exploration of caregivers' perspective on smartphone-based solutions for managing severe mental illnesses in low resource settings.PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0203353. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203353. eCollection 2018. PLoS One. 2018. PMID: 30231056 Free PMC article.
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
IMPRoving Outcomes for children exposed to domestic ViolencE (IMPROVE): an evidence synthesis.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016 Dec. NIHR Journals Library. 2016. PMID: 27977089 Free Books & Documents. Review.
New ways of working in mental health services: a qualitative, comparative case study assessing and informing the emergence of new peer worker roles in mental health services in England.Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2014 Jul. NIHR Journals Library. 2014. PMID: 27466663 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by 7 articles
Promoting meaningful recovery with digital mental health care.Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Feb 26;29:e105. doi: 10.1017/S2045796020000165. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020. PMID: 32100662 Free PMC article.
Smartphones in mental health: a critical review of background issues, current status and future concerns.Int J Bipolar Disord. 2020 Jan 10;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40345-019-0164-x. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2020. PMID: 31919635 Free PMC article. Review.
Predicting engagement with an online psychosocial intervention for psychosis: Exploring individual- and intervention-level predictors.Internet Interv. 2019 Aug 15;18:100266. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2019.100266. eCollection 2019 Dec. Internet Interv. 2019. PMID: 31890619 Free PMC article.
The Digital Psychiatrist: In Search of Evidence-Based Apps for Anxiety and Depression.Front Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 15;10:831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00831. eCollection 2019. Front Psychiatry. 2019. PMID: 31803083 Free PMC article. Review.
The technology specialist: a 21st century support role in clinical care.NPJ Digit Med. 2019 Jun 26;2:61. doi: 10.1038/s41746-019-0137-6. eCollection 2019. NPJ Digit Med. 2019. PMID: 31388565 Free PMC article.