Using item response theory with health system data to identify latent groups of patients with multiple health conditions

PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0206915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206915. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

A critical step toward tailoring effective interventions for heterogeneous and medically complex patients is to identify clinically meaningful subgroups on the basis of their comorbid conditions. We applied Item Response Theory (IRT), a potentially useful tool to identify clinically meaningful subgroups, to characterize phenotypes within a cohort of high-risk patients. This was a retrospective cohort study using 68,400 high-risk Veteran's Health Administration (VHA) patients. Thirty-one physical and mental health diagnosis indicators based on ICD-9 codes from patients' inpatient, outpatient VHA and VA-paid community care claims. Results revealed 6 distinct subgroups of high-risk patients were identified: substance use, complex mental health, complex diabetes, liver disease, cancer with cardiovascular disease, and cancer with mental health. Multinomial analyses showed that subgroups significantly differed on demographic and utilization variables which underscored the uniqueness of the groups. Using IRT models with clinical diagnoses from electronic health records permitted identification of diagnostic constellations among otherwise undifferentiated high-risk patients. Recognizing distinct patient profiles provides a framework from which insights into medical complexity of high-risk patients can be explored and effective interventions can be tailored.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Data Interpretation, Statistical*
  • Electronic Health Records / statistics & numerical data*
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multimorbidity*
  • Patient Selection*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Veterans / statistics & numerical data*

Grants and funding

This work was funded by the United States (US) Department of Veteran Affairs, Veterans Health Administration Office of Primary Care Operations and Office of Primary Care Services. The Veterans Health Administration had no role in the design, conduct or analysis of this study or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.