Unrecognized Elevations of Toxic Elements in Urine and Blood Highlight the Potential Need for a Broader Approach to Exposure Assessment

Abstract

Heavy metals testing remains an ongoing challenge for diagnosing acute or chronic exposure to heavy metals. In this study, we determined the positivity rates of single element and panel testing for toxic elements, and evaluated the potential utility of an expanded detection protocol for screening of toxic element exposures. The retrospective analysis included data from urine (n = 19,343) and blood (n = 196,019) specimens tested using inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) for arsenic, cadmium, lead and mercury (blood), and arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury and zinc (urine). Lead industrial monitoring in blood and cadmium exposure in blood and urine were included to represent directed single element ordering. The percent of positive results, defined as results greater than the upper limit of the reference interval was determined. For blood, the highest positivity was observed for lead occupational exposure monitoring (26.2%) whereas for urine, the highest positivity was observed for zinc testing (28.1%). Remarkably, reanalysis using an expanded panel, of 120 blood and 174 urine specimens originally negative identified 42% (50 of 120) of the blood specimens with at least one elevated result and 48% (83 of 174) of the urine specimens with at least one elevated result. Our results indicate that a broad elemental screening panel may help ensure easier identification of elemental exposure and may eliminate the need for additional follow-up sample collections.