Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Nov 14:9:2169.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02169. eCollection 2018.

Placing Abstract Concepts in Space: Quantity, Time and Emotional Valence

Affiliations

Placing Abstract Concepts in Space: Quantity, Time and Emotional Valence

Greg Woodin et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Research has shown that abstract concepts are often conceptualized along horizontal and vertical axes. However, there are mixed results concerning which axis is preferred for which type of conceptual domain. For instance, it has been suggested that the vertical axis may be preferred for quantity in tasks using linguistic stimuli (e.g., 'more,' 'less'), whereas numerals (e.g., '1,' '2,' '3') may be more prone to horizontal conceptualization. In this study, we used a task with free response options to see where participants would place quantity words ('most,' 'more,' 'less,' 'least'), numerals ('2,' '4,' '7,' '9'), time words ('past,' 'future,' 'earliest,' 'earlier,' 'later,' 'latest') and emotional valence words ('best,' 'better,' 'worse,' 'worst'). We find that for quantity words, the vertical axis was preferred; whereas for numerals, participants preferred the horizontal axis. For time concepts, participants preferred the horizontal axis; and for emotional valence, they preferred the vertical axis. Across all tasks, participants tended to use specific axes (horizontal, vertical), rather than combining these two axes in diagonal responses. These results shed light on the spatial nature of abstract thought.

Keywords: abstract thought; mental representation; metaphor; numerical cognition; spatial cognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Experiment 1: Dominant Orientation (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) as a function of task; r indicates adjusted standardized Pearson residuals, which are based on the pooled data (participants contribute multiple data points), and H indicates Shannon entropy scores.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Experiment 2: Dominant Orientation (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) as a function of Task; r indicates adjusted standardized Pearson residuals, which are based on the pooled data (participants contribute multiple data points), and H indicates Shannon entropy scores.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Experiment 2: Range of responses (smallest to largest) along the x-axis and the y-axis for each of the tasks; whiskers represent the largest/smallest number within 1.5 times the interquartile range extending from the box.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Experiment 3: Dominant Orientation (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) for the exact quantity task (placing the numerals 2, 4, 7, and 9); r indicates adjusted standardized Pearson residuals, and H indicates Shannon entropy scores, both of which are based on only the data from this task.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Experiment 4: Dominant Orientation (horizontal, vertical, diagonal) as a function of Task; r indicates adjusted standardized Pearson residuals, which are based on the pooled data (participants contribute multiple data points), and H indicates Shannon entropy scores.
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Range of responses (smallest to largest) along the x-axis and the y-axis for each of the tasks; whiskers represent the largest/smallest number within 1.5 times the interquartile range extending from the box.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Barsalou L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behav. Brain Sci. 22 577–660. 10.1017/S0140525X99002149 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates D., Maechler M., Bolker B., Walker S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Statist. Softw. 67 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
    1. Bergen B. K., Chan Lau T. T. (2012). Writing direction affects how people map space onto time. Front. Psychol. 3:109. 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonato M., Zorzi M., Umiltà C. (2012). When time is space: evidence for a mental time line. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36 2257–2273. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.08.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Boroditsky L. (2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognit. Psychol. 43 1–22. 10.1006/cogp.2001.0748 - DOI - PubMed