Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
, 13, 55
eCollection

Outcomes of Selective Nonoperative Management of Civilian Abdominal Gunshot Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Outcomes of Selective Nonoperative Management of Civilian Abdominal Gunshot Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aziza N Al Rawahi et al. World J Emerg Surg.

Abstract

Background: Although mandatory laparotomy has been standard of care for patients with abdominal gunshot wounds (GSWs) for decades, this approach is associated with non-therapeutic operations, morbidity, and long hospital stays. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to summarize outcomes of selective nonoperative management (SNOM) of civilian abdominal GSWs.

Methods: We searched electronic databases (March 1966-April 1, 2017) and reference lists of articles included in the systematic review for studies reporting outcomes of SNOM of civilian abdominal GSWs. We meta-analyzed the associated risks of SNOM-related failure (defined as laparotomy during hospital admission), mortality, and morbidity across included studies using DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models. Between-study heterogeneity was assessed by calculating I 2 statistics and conducting tests of homogeneity.

Results: Of 7155 citations identified, we included 41 studies [n = 22,847 patients with abdominal GSWs, of whom 6777 (29.7%) underwent SNOM]. The pooled risk of failure of SNOM in hemodynamically stable patients without a reduced level of consciousness or signs of peritonitis was 7.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.9-10.1%; I 2 = 92.6%, homogeneity p < 0.001] while the pooled mortality associated with use of SNOM in this patient population was 0.4% (95% CI = 0.2-0.6%; I 2 = 0%, homogeneity p > 0.99). In patients who failed SNOM, the pooled estimate of the risk of therapeutic laparotomy was 68.0% (95% CI = 58.3-77.7%; I 2 = 91.5%; homogeneity p < 0.001). Risks of failure of SNOM were lowest in studies that evaluated patients with right thoracoabdomen (3.4%; 95% CI = 0-7.0%; I 2 = 0%; homogeneity p = 0.45), flank (7.0%; 95% CI = 3.9-10.1%), and back (3.1%; 95% CI = 0-6.5%) GSWs and highest in those that evaluated patients with anterior abdomen (13.2%; 95% CI = 6.3-20.1%) GSWs. In patients who underwent mandatory abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT), the pooled risk of failure was 4.1% versus 8.3% in those who underwent selective CT (p = 0.08). The overall sample-size-weighted mean hospital length of stay among patients who underwent SNOM was 6 days versus 10 days if they failed SNOM or developed an in-hospital complication.

Conclusions: SNOM of abdominal GSWs is safe when conducted in hemodynamically stable patients without a reduced level of consciousness or signs of peritonitis. Failure of SNOM may be lower in patients with GSWs to the back, flank, or right thoracoabdomen and be decreased by mandatory use of abdominopelvic CT scans.

Keywords: Abdominal gunshot wounds; Penetrating trauma; Selective nonoperative management; Wounds and injuries.

Conflict of interest statement

Not applicable.Not applicable.AWK has received funding from Kinetic Concepts Incorporated for a randomized controlled trial comparing the ABThera™ Open Abdomen Negative Pressure Therapy system and Barker’s vacuum pack temporary abdominal closure techniques. He has also received travel funding from LifeCell Corp., Syntheses, and Innovative Trauma Care. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow of articles through the systematic review, where LOS indicates length of stay, GSWs gunshot wounds, and SNOM selective nonoperative management
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Pooled risk of failure in civilians undergoing selective nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Pooled risk of mortality in civilians undergoing selective nonoperative management of abdominal gunshot wounds
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Funnel plot of the risk of failure of selective nonoperative management versus the associated standard error of the risk of failure

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by 1 article

References

    1. Shaftan GW. Selective conservatism in penetrating abdominal trauma. J Trauma. 1969;9:1026–1028. doi: 10.1097/00005373-196912000-00014. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Singh N, Hardcastle TC. Selective non operative management of gunshot wounds to the abdomen: a collective review. Int Emerg Nurs. 2015;23(1):22–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2014.06.005. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nance FC, Cohn I., Jr Surgical judgment in the management of stab wounds of the abdomen: a retrospective and prospective analysis based on a study of 600 stabbed patients. Ann Surg. 1969;170:569–580. doi: 10.1097/00000658-196910000-00008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sosa JL, Arrilaga A, Puente I, et al. Laparoscopy in 121 consecutive patients with abdominal gunshot wounds. J Trauma. 1995;39:501–504. doi: 10.1097/00005373-199509000-00017. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ross SE, Dragon GM, O’Malley KF, et al. Morbidity of negative coeliotomy in trauma. Injury. 1995;26:393–394. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(95)00058-H. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Grant support

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback