Finding the Balance Between Benefits and Harms When Using Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Modeling Study
- PMID: 30508425
- DOI: 10.7326/M18-1279
Finding the Balance Between Benefits and Harms When Using Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: A Modeling Study
Abstract
Background: Many guidelines use expected risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) during the next 10 years as a basis for recommendations on use of statins for primary prevention of CVD. However, how harms were considered and weighed against benefits is often unclear.
Objective: To identify the expected risk above which statins provide net benefit.
Design: Quantitative benefit-harm balance modeling study.
Data sources: Network meta-analysis of primary prevention trials, a preference survey, and selected observational studies.
Target population: Persons aged 40 to 75 years with no history of CVD.
Time horizon: 10 years.
Perspective: Clinicians and guideline developers.
Intervention: Low- or moderate-dose statin versus no statin.
Outcome measures: The 10-year risk for CVD at which statins provide at least a 60% probability of net benefit, with baseline risk, frequencies of and preferences for statin benefits and harms, and competing risk for non-CVD death taken into account.
Results of base-case analysis: Younger men had net benefit at a lower 10-year risk for CVD than older men (14% for ages 40 to 44 years vs. 21% for ages 70 to 75 years). In women, the risk required for net benefit was higher (17% for ages 40 to 44 years vs. 22% for ages 70 to 75 years). Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin provided net benefit at lower 10-year risks than simvastatin and pravastatin.
Results of sensitivity analysis: Most alternative assumptions led to similar findings.
Limitation: Age-specific data for some harms were not available.
Conclusion: Statins provide net benefits at higher 10-year risks for CVD than are reflected in most current guidelines. In addition, the level of risk at which net benefit occurs varies considerably by age, sex, and statin type.
Primary funding source: Swiss Government Excellence Scholarship Office, Béatrice Ederer-Weber Foundation, and North-South Cooperation at the University of Zurich.
Comment in
-
Weighing the Harms and Benefits of Using Statins for Primary Prevention: Raising the Risk Threshold.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;170(1):62-63. doi: 10.7326/M18-3066. Epub 2018 Dec 4. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 30508426 No abstract available.
-
Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):72. doi: 10.7326/L19-0257. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31261394 No abstract available.
-
Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):74. doi: 10.7326/L19-0258. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31261395 No abstract available.
-
Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):72-73. doi: 10.7326/L19-0259. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31261396 No abstract available.
-
Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):73. doi: 10.7326/L19-0260. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31261397 No abstract available.
-
Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):73-74. doi: 10.7326/L19-0261. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31261398 No abstract available.
-
Statins for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease.Ann Intern Med. 2019 Jul 2;171(1):74-76. doi: 10.7326/L19-0262. Ann Intern Med. 2019. PMID: 31261399 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparative effectiveness and safety of statins as a class and of specific statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis of randomized trials with 94,283 participants.Am Heart J. 2019 Apr;210:18-28. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.12.007. Epub 2019 Jan 10. Am Heart J. 2019. PMID: 30716508
-
Global variation of risk thresholds for initiating statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: a benefit-harm balance modelling study.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020 Sep 17;20(1):418. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01697-6. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020. PMID: 32942999 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of statins for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and persistent physical disability in older adults.Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;78(3):467-476. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03239-1. Epub 2021 Oct 26. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022. PMID: 34698889 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A systematic review and economic evaluation of statins for the prevention of coronary events.Health Technol Assess. 2007 Apr;11(14):1-160, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta11140. Health Technol Assess. 2007. PMID: 17408535 Review.
-
Aspirin Use to Prevent Cardiovascular Disease and Colorectal Cancer: An Updated Decision Analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 Apr. Report No.: 21-05283-EF-2. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2022 Apr. Report No.: 21-05283-EF-2. PMID: 35648884 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Optimal risk thresholds for prescribing statins as primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in Iranian general population: a benefit-harm modelling study.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Oct 18;24(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04242-x. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024. PMID: 39425029 Free PMC article.
-
GLP-1 receptor agonists for weight reduction in people living with obesity but without diabetes: a living benefit-harm modelling study.EClinicalMedicine. 2024 May 27;73:102661. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102661. eCollection 2024 Jul. EClinicalMedicine. 2024. PMID: 38846069 Free PMC article.
-
Bempedoic Acid for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Statin-Intolerant Patients.JAMA. 2023 Jul 11;330(2):131-140. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.9696. JAMA. 2023. PMID: 37354546 Free PMC article.
-
Older adult preferences regarding benefits and harms of statin and aspirin therapy for cardiovascular primary prevention.Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Jan 30;13:100468. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpc.2023.100468. eCollection 2023 Mar. Am J Prev Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 36785763 Free PMC article.
-
Opposing View: A Blind Faith in Meta-Analyses in Academia Could Be a Threat to Public Health.J Lipid Atheroscler. 2022 Sep;11(3):308-313. doi: 10.12997/jla.2022.11.3.308. Epub 2022 Sep 15. J Lipid Atheroscler. 2022. PMID: 36212751 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials