Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Dec 6;13(12):e0208273.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208273. eCollection 2018.

An efficient proteome-wide strategy for discovery and characterization of cellular nucleotide-protein interactions

Affiliations

An efficient proteome-wide strategy for discovery and characterization of cellular nucleotide-protein interactions

Yan Ting Lim et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Metabolite-protein interactions define the output of metabolic pathways and regulate many cellular processes. Although diseases are often characterized by distortions in metabolic processes, efficient means to discover and study such interactions directly in cells have been lacking. A stringent implementation of proteome-wide Cellular Thermal Shift Assay (CETSA) was developed and applied to key cellular nucleotides, where previously experimentally confirmed protein-nucleotide interactions were well recaptured. Many predicted, but never experimentally confirmed, as well as novel protein-nucleotide interactions were discovered. Interactions included a range of different protein families where nucleotides serve as substrates, products, co-factors or regulators. In cells exposed to thymidine, a limiting precursor for DNA synthesis, both dose- and time-dependence of the intracellular binding events for sequentially generated thymidine metabolites were revealed. Interactions included known cancer targets in deoxyribonucleotide metabolism as well as novel interacting proteins. This stringent CETSA based strategy will be applicable for a wide range of metabolites and will therefore greatly facilitate the discovery and studies of interactions and specificities of the many metabolites in human cells that remain uncharacterized.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Optimized CETSA workflow for profiling protein-nucleotide interactions in whole cell and lysate conditions, and relative affinities and specificities of the eight nucleotides for their identified hit proteins in lysate-ITDR experiments.
(A) ITDR and melt curves workflows were applied to lysate experiments and in-cell ITDR and ITTR to whole cell experiments as a proxy for tracking the uptake and conversion of metabolite precursors in vitro. (B) Colour scale represents the minimal dose threshold (MDT) (μM) of the isothermal dose response at 52°C, with the lowest MDT (therefore higher relative affinity) in blue and the highest MDT (therefore lower relative affinity) in yellow. Hit proteins are grouped according to their associated biochemical pathways and function (black lines). Asterisks (*) indicate destabilizing hits. Black dotted boxes indicate proteins with similar ITDR responses that did not meet the hit selection criteria.
Fig 2
Fig 2. CETSA shifts and ITDRCETSA with cAMP and cGMP in K562 lysates.
(A) CETSA shifts (left) and ITDRCETSA (right) for subunits of cAMP-dependent protein kinase A (PKA) (regulatory: PRKAR1A, PRKAR2A, PRKAR1B, PRKAR2B and catalytic PRKACA), with cAMP (blue), cGMP (red) and control untreated CETSA curves (grey) measured in K562 cell lysates. (B) ITDRCETSA hit plot with AUC (area under the curve) versus R2 plot of ITDRCETSA curves from cAMP/cGMP-treated conditions. Each dot represents the average AUC (relative thermal shift) and R2 ITDRCETSA (dose response trend) measurements per protein from two replicates. The size of the dot negatively correlates with the MDT. (C) ITDRCETSA for small membrane A-kinase anchor protein (SMAKA) with cAMP and cGMP. Colors as in Fig 2A. (D) ITDRCETSA for homologs of phosphofructokinase (PFK)—PFKM (muscle), PFKL (liver), PFKP (platelet) with cAMP. Data is presented as two individual technical replicates for each protein. Cells were stimulated for the indicated durations (0, 15, 60 mins and overnight (ON)) with 0.5 mM of forskolin (For), 2 mM of Db-cAMP (Db) or Br-cAMP (Br), the samples were used to measure (E) cAMP level in lysates, (F) target engagement using CETSA-western blot for PFKM, RIA, RIIB and actin, and (G) lactate secretion, glucose uptake, intracellular lactate and glucose levels. RLU: relative luminescence units. * <0.05, **, <0.01, two-tailed t-test.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Protein hits from lysate CETSA with deoxynucleotides.
(A) ITDRCETSA hit plot with AUC versus R2 plot of ITDRCETSA curves after lysate treatment with AMP, dAMP, dCMP, dGMP, dTMP, and dUMP. Each dot represents the average AUC (relative thermal shift) and R2 ITDRCETSA (dose response trend) measurements per protein from two replicates. The size of the dot negatively correlates with the MDT. (B) Schematic of the proteins in the core nucleotide metabolism responding to the five deoxynucleotides and AMP. SAMHD1 and RRM1 were hits in the in-cell ITDRCETSA experiment (Fig 5). (C) ITDRCETSA (top) and CETSA curves (bottom) with the dNMPs for enzymes involved in the deoxypyrimidine salvage and synthesis pathways; adenylate kinase 4 (AK4), deoxycytidine kinase (DCK), deoxyguanosine kinase (DGK), thymidine kinase (TK1), thymidylate kinase (TYMK) and thymidylate synthase (TYMS). Data is presented as two individual technical replicates for each condition from one representative experiment. (D) Other protein hits from dNMPs-ITDRCETSA involved in the nucleotide metabolism: 7-methylguanosine specific 5’-nucleotidase (NT5C3B), adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (APRT) and UMP synthase (UMPS). Data is presented as two individual technical replicates for each condition from one representative experiment.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Protein hits from NAD(P)(H) ITDRCETSA.
(A) ITDR hit plots with AUC versus R2 plot of ITDRCETSA curves from lysates treated with NADPH, NADP, NADH, and NAD. Each dot represents the average AUC (relative thermal shift) and R2 ITDRCETSA (dose response trend) measurements per protein from two replicates. The size of the dot negatively correlates with the MDT. (B) Relative affinities and specificities of the four nicotinamide-based nucleotides for their identified hit proteins. Colour scale represents the minimal dose threshold (MDT in μM) of the isothermal dose response at 52°C, with the lowest MDT (therefore higher relative affinity) in blue and the highest MDT (therefore lower relative affinity) in yellow. Hit proteins are grouped according to their associated biochemical pathways and function (black lines), and overlaps indicate their association with more than one pathway/function. Asterisks (*) indicate destabilizing hits. Black dotted boxes indicate proteins with similar ITDR responses that did not meet the hit selection criteria. (C) Protein domain analysis in the NAD(P)(H) hit proteins. Hit proteins are clustered in 5 broad Interpro domain clusters (1–5), with 5 subclusters (A-E) under cluster 1. NAD annotated protein (black circular outline), NADP (red circular outline), NAD and NADP annotated (grey circular outline). Unannotated proteins are not outlined. Annotations were taken from Uniprot KB. (D) Thermal precipitation assay with recombinant CORO1C and increasing doses of NADPH at ITDRCETSA 52°C.
Fig 5
Fig 5. Hit proteins from the in-cell ITDRCETSA experiments with thymidine.
(A) In-cell MS-ITDRCETSA curves of enzymes involved in the thymidine metabolism cascade. (B) Lysate-western blot (WB)-ITDRCETSA validation with dTXP. Lysates were treated with 10, 2.5, 0.6, 0.1 and 0 (control) mM of dT, TMP, TDP or TTP and probed for RRM1 and ABCF1 with actin as loading control. (C) In-cell MS-ITDRCETSA curves of ABCF1 and ABCF2. Data is presented as two individual technical replicates for each condition from 2 biological replicates (biological replicate 1 (dT_b1, blue) and biological replicate 2 (dT_b2, red)). (D) Thermal stabilization kinetics between TYMS (red) and SAMHD1 (blue) from the in-cell ITTRCETSA experiments with thymidine. Data is presented as two biological replicates at 37°C (TYMS_37°C, SAMHD1_37°C) and 52°C (TYMS_52°C, SAMHD1_52°C), with focus on the incubation duration of 0 to 30 mins. (E) Summary of hits identified by: in-cell MS-ITDRCETSA (dotted lines); lysate MS-ITDRCETSA (solid lines); validated by WB-ITDRCETSA (grey dotted lines). Common hits from the in-cell and lysate MS-ITDRCETSA (yellow circle); metabolites (grey circle); known metabolite-protein interactions (grey solid lines).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nohturfft A, Zhang SC. Coordination of lipid metabolism in membrane biogenesis. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2009;25:539–66. 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.24.110707.175344 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lane AN, Fan TW. Regulation of mammalian nucleotide metabolism and biosynthesis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(4):2466–85. 10.1093/nar/gkv047 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4344498. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lorendeau D, Christen S, Rinaldi G, Fendt SM. Metabolic control of signalling pathways and metabolic auto-regulation. Biol Cell. 2015;107(8):251–72. 10.1111/boc.201500015 . - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yizhak K, Chaneton B, Gottlieb E, Ruppin E. Modeling cancer metabolism on a genome scale. Mol Syst Biol. 2015;11(6):817 doi: 10.15252/msb.20145307 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4501850. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeBerardinis RJ, Thompson CB. Cellular metabolism and disease: what do metabolic outliers teach us? Cell. 2012;148(6):1132–44. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.032 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3337773. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Grants and funding

This work was supported by Nanyang Technological University, http://www.ntu.edu.sg, to PN, the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet), https://www.vr.se, to PN, the Swedish Cancer Society (Cancerfonden), https://www.cancerfonden.se, to PN, Radiumhemmets research fund, to PN, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg foundation (Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse), https://kaw.wallenberg.org, to PN, Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council, www.nmrc.gov.sg, MOHIAFCAT2/004/2015, to PN, RMS, and AL, and Agency for Science, Technology and Research Council (A-STAR BMRC) YIG2015 grant, https://www.a-star.edu.sg/About-A-STAR/Biomedical-Research-Council/BMRC-Board, to RMS. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.