Remote monitoring of implantable cardioverter defibrillators: Patient experiences and preferences for follow-up

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019 Feb;42(2):120-129. doi: 10.1111/pace.13574. Epub 2019 Jan 2.

Abstract

Background: Patient satisfaction with remote patient monitoring (RPM) of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) seems to be high, yet knowledge on long-term patient experiences is limited. The European REMOTE-CIED study explored patients' experiences with RPM, examined patient's preferences for ICD follow-up, and identified determinants of patient's preferences in the first 2 years postimplantation.

Methods: European heart failure patients (N = 300; median age = 66 years [interquartile range (IQR) = 59-73], and 22% female) with a first-time ICD received a Boston Scientific LATITUDE RPM system (Marlborough, MA, USA) and had scheduled in-clinic follow-ups once a year. Patients completed questionnaires at 1-2 weeks and also at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postimplantation and clinical data were obtained from their medical records. Patient evaluation data were analyzed descriptively, and Student's t-tests/Man-Whitney U tests or Chi-square tests/Fisher's exact tests were performed to examine determinants of patient preferences.

Results: At 2 years postimplantation, the median patient satisfaction score with the RPM system was 9 out of 10 (IQR = 8-10), despite 53% of the patients experiencing issues (eg, failure to transmit data). Of the 221 patients who reported their follow-up preferences, 43% preferred RPM and 19% preferred in-clinic follow-up. Patients with a preference for RPM were more likely to be higher educated (P = 0.04), employed (P = 0.04), and equipped with a new LATITUDE model (P = 0.04), but less likely to suffer from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P = 0.009).

Conclusion: In general, patients were highly satisfied with RPM, but a subgroup preferred in-clinic follow-up. Therefore, physicians should include patients' concerns and preferences in the decision-making process, to tailor device follow-up to individual patients' needs and preferences.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01691586.

Keywords: implantable cardioverter defibrillator; patient experiences; patient preferences; remote patient monitoring.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Defibrillators, Implantable*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Heart Failure / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods*
  • Patient Preference
  • Patient Satisfaction*
  • Self Report
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Telemedicine*

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01691586