Approaches to Capturing Value in Oncology

Recent Results Cancer Res. 2019;213:85-108. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-01207-6_7.

Abstract

This article sets out to describe different value frameworks in the field of new developments in oncology. Since the costs of new oncological therapies follow a steep path, their implementation and financing demand a thorough assessment. This is an ambitious task due to the complex nature of oncological treatments within overall health policy. Five value frameworks were reviewed: European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale, American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Value Framework (version 2.0), National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Evidence Blocks, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center DrugAbacus, and the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review Value Assessment Framework. They are all based on a large set of criteria. However, all these frameworks differ considerably in their outcomes. Among the main differences one has to cite are the inclusion of costs and the use of different outcomes, as well as the fact that they address different target stakeholders, etc. Despite these shortcomings, the value frameworks serve the necessity to introduce more rationality in health decision making seen from the perspective of physicians, patients, and financing bodies.

Keywords: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio; Quality-adjusted life year; Value framework; Willingness-to-pay threshold.

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Decision Making*
  • Humans
  • Medical Oncology / economics*