Background: Pain while sitting is the primary complaint of many patients with lumbar spinal ailments, including those with discogenic low back pain and lumbar disc herniations. There has been little basic research on the different mechanical stresses that different sitting positions place on the spine. To demonstrate the effect of different sitting positions on lumbar intersegmental relationships.
Methods: Twenty healthy male volunteer subjects were recruited. Lateral X-rays of the lower lumbar spine were taken in four positions: (I) relaxed lateral standing; (II) "standard" sitting position; (III) sitting on a "kneeling" chair; and (IV) unsupported sitting on a stool. Anterior and posterior disc height, disc space angulation, L1-S1 angulation and interspinous distance were measured.
Results: The L1-S1 lordotic angle in the standing position (48.8°±14.7°) was found to be statistically significantly greater than the angle measured with any of the sitting positions: the kneeling chair (34.0°±17.7°); hard-back chair (28.6°±14.3°); and the stool (16.6°±15.6°). Total average disc height (arithmetic sum of average disc heights L2-S1) in the lumbar spine varied with position: standing (40.5±7.75 mm); hard-back chair (38.5±6.9 mm); kneeling chair (38.4±7.9 mm); stool (36.9±7.1 mm). The mean interspinous distance over all the lumbar levels was significantly greater in each of the three seated positions than in the standing position: standing 6.8±4.5 mm; 11.6°±7.5° for the kneeling chair; 12.9±5.8 mm for the hard-back chair; 16.9±7.0 mm for the stool.
Conclusions: If segmental flexion and segmental loading are the important biomechanical correlates of pain on sitting, such patients should be most comfortable in a kneeling chair, which most closely approximates the standing position. These basic findings will allow better assessment of different seating positions from an ergonomic perspective, and hopefully lead to improvements in chair design.
Keywords: Low back pain; lumbar disc herniation; sitting.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Lumbar intersegmental spacing and angulation in the modified lateral decubitus position versus variants of prone positioning.Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):580-4. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.04.002. Epub 2009 May 30. Spine J. 2009. PMID: 19482515
Does Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease Influence Femoroacetabular Flexion in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Aug;474(8):1788-97. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4787-2. Epub 2016 Mar 28. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016. PMID: 27020429 Free PMC article.
The Effect of Standing and Different Sitting Positions on Lumbar Lordosis: Radiographic Study of 30 Healthy Volunteers.Asian Spine J. 2015 Oct;9(5):762-9. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.5.762. Epub 2015 Sep 22. Asian Spine J. 2015. PMID: 26435796 Free PMC article.
A comparison study on the change in lumbar lordosis when standing, sitting on a chair, and sitting on the floor in normal individuals.J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012 Jan;51(1):20-3. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2012.51.1.20. Epub 2012 Jan 31. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012. PMID: 22396838 Free PMC article.
Sitting versus standing: does the intradiscal pressure cause disc degeneration or low back pain?J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008 Aug;18(4):550-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2006.10.011. Epub 2007 Mar 7. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2008. PMID: 17346987 Review.