Effect of barriers and distance on song, genetic, and morphological divergence in the highland endemic Timberline Wren (Thryorchilus browni, Troglodytidae)

PLoS One. 2018 Dec 20;13(12):e0209508. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209508. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

Populations may become isolated by distance, geographic barriers or both. Isolated populations often diverge in behavioral, morphological and genetic traits as a result of reduced inter-population gene flow. Highland species commonly present naturally fragmented distributions that confine populations to the highest mountain peaks, isolated by mountain passes and distance. The endemic Timberline Wren (Thryorchilus browni) inhabits the highlands of the Talamanca mountain range, including western Panama, and the highest peak in the Central Volcanic mountain range of Costa Rica. Using microsatellites and song recordings we studied the effect of a geographic barrier and distance on song, genetic and morphological divergence among four populations in Costa Rica. A lowland mountain pass resulted in the largest genetic, vocal, and morphological (bill length) differences among populations, likely due to reduce the gene flow. Cultural drift and assortative mating by females selecting songs from their own population likely accentuates the effect of isolation and limited gene flow between populations. This pattern of population divergence has been found in other Neotropical highland birds, but over larger geographical scales. We conclude that mountain passes and distance both reduce gene flow between populations in recently-isolated highland species with restricted distributions.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Beak / anatomy & histology
  • Biodiversity*
  • Costa Rica
  • Genetic Speciation
  • Geography
  • Male
  • Microsatellite Repeats / genetics
  • Panama
  • Phenotype
  • Reproductive Isolation*
  • Songbirds / anatomy & histology
  • Songbirds / physiology*
  • Vocalization, Animal / physiology*

Grants and funding

The authors received partial funding from Vicerrectoría de Investigación, Universidad de Costa Rica. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.