The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: Accounting for environmental sustainability
- PMID: 30577021
- DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.212
The trilemma of trade, monetary and immigration policies in the United States: Accounting for environmental sustainability
Abstract
The United States like every other country across the globe, especially the developed nations, have consistently battled one of man's greatest challenge of the 21st century-saving and sustaining the dire environment. Being the largest emitter of carbon dioxide (CO2) after China, the United States is increasingly faced with an urgent policy drive toward environmental sustainability. Against the backdrop, this study employed the dynamic ARDL-bound testing approach to observing the tripartite impact of the trade policy, monetary policy, and migration index on carbon emissions over the period 1990:Q1-2018: Q2. The incorporated renewable energy consumption and the real GDP which controls for other unobserved factors are observed to have similar and significant impacts as in previous studies. The current study found that the trade policy, monetary policy, and migration index exerts positive and significant impacts on carbon dioxide emissions in the long-run. It implies that in the near future, the environmental sustainability of the United States is at the risk of the government policies on trade, monetary, and migration. However, such impact of the migration index on the carbon dioxide emissions is barely significant in the long-run and at the immediate time. Although the impact of the government's trade policy on carbon dioxide emissions is significant in the long-run, it immediate impact is negative and not significant. Hence, policy frameworks of the government should be designed such that it meets the Sustainable Development Goals 2030.
Keywords: Carbon emissions; Migration index; Monetary policy; Sustainable environment; Trade policy; United States.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Similar articles
-
The role of renewable energy, immigration and real income in environmental sustainability target. Evidence from Europe largest states.Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jul 15;674:307-315. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.163. Epub 2019 Apr 13. Sci Total Environ. 2019. PMID: 31005832
-
Toward next-generation green solar cells and environmental sustainability: impact of innovation in photovoltaic energy generation, distribution, or transmission-related technologies on environmental sustainability in the United States.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(59):89662-89680. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21953-w. Epub 2022 Jul 20. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022. PMID: 35857166
-
Revisiting the EKC hypothesis by assessing the complementarities between fiscal, monetary, and environmental development policies in China.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Apr;29(16):23545-23560. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-17288-7. Epub 2021 Nov 22. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022. PMID: 34807388
-
The role of partisan conflict in environmental sustainability targets of the United States.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Apr;27(10):10265-10274. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-07174-8. Epub 2020 Jan 13. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020. PMID: 31933092
-
Review and challenges of policies of environmental protection and sustainable development in China.J Environ Manage. 2008 Sep;88(4):1249-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.06.019. Epub 2007 Sep 4. J Environ Manage. 2008. PMID: 17767999 Review.
Cited by
-
The effects of gas flaring as moderated by government quality in leading natural gas flaring economies.Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 1;13(1):14394. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-38032-w. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37658056 Free PMC article.
-
Insights from BRICS-T economies on the impact of human capital and renewable electricity consumption on environmental quality.Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 31;13(1):5245. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32134-1. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37002347 Free PMC article.
-
Revisiting the Relationship Between the Strength of Environmental Regulation and Foreign Direct Investment.Front Psychol. 2022 May 12;13:899918. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.899918. eCollection 2022. Front Psychol. 2022. PMID: 35645892 Free PMC article.
-
Assessing the asymmetric impact of physical infrastructure and trade openness on ecological footprint: An empirical evidence from Pakistan.PLoS One. 2022 May 17;17(5):e0262782. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0262782. eCollection 2022. PLoS One. 2022. PMID: 35580086 Free PMC article.
-
The role of economic freedom and clean energy in environmental sustainability: implication for the G-20 economies.Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 May;29(24):36608-36615. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-18666-5. Epub 2022 Jan 22. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022. PMID: 35066852 Free PMC article.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
