Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies
- PMID: 30602577
- PMCID: PMC6313893
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.k4718
Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies
Erratum in
-
Association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners and health outcomes: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials and observational studies.BMJ. 2019 Jan 15;364:l156. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l156. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30647061 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between intake of non-sugar sweeteners (NSS) and important health outcomes in generally healthy or overweight/obese adults and children.
Design: Systematic review following standard Cochrane review methodology.
Data sources: Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, Clinicaltrials.gov, and reference lists of relevant publications.
Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: Studies including generally healthy adults or children with or without overweight or obesity were eligible. Included study designs allowed for a direct comparison of no intake or lower intake of NSS with higher NSS intake. NSSs had to be clearly named, the dose had to be within the acceptable daily intake, and the intervention duration had to be at least seven days.
Main outcome measures: Body weight or body mass index, glycaemic control, oral health, eating behaviour, preference for sweet taste, cancer, cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, mood, behaviour, neurocognition, and adverse effects.
Results: The search resulted in 13 941 unique records. Of 56 individual studies that provided data for this review, 35 were observational studies. In adults, evidence of very low and low certainty from a limited number of small studies indicated a small beneficial effect of NSSs on body mass index (mean difference -0.6, 95% confidence interval -1.19 to -0.01; two studies, n=174) and fasting blood glucose (-0.16 mmol/L, -0.26 to -0.06; two, n=52). Lower doses of NSSs were associated with lower weight gain (-0.09 kg, -0.13 to -0.05; one, n=17 934) compared with higher doses of NSSs (very low certainty of evidence). For all other outcomes, no differences were detected between the use and non-use of NSSs, or between different doses of NSSs. No evidence of any effect of NSSs was seen on overweight or obese adults or children actively trying to lose weight (very low to moderate certainty). In children, a smaller increase in body mass index z score was observed with NSS intake compared with sugar intake (-0.15, -0.17 to -0.12; two, n=528, moderate certainty of evidence), but no significant differences were observed in body weight (-0.60 kg, -1.33 to 0.14; two, n=467, low certainty of evidence), or between different doses of NSSs (very low to moderate certainty).
Conclusions: Most health outcomes did not seem to have differences between the NSS exposed and unexposed groups. Of the few studies identified for each outcome, most had few participants, were of short duration, and their methodological and reporting quality was limited; therefore, confidence in the reported results is limited. Future studies should assess the effects of NSSs with an appropriate intervention duration. Detailed descriptions of interventions, comparators, and outcomes should be included in all reports.
Systematic review registration: Prospero CRD42017047668.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: support from WHO for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
Figures
Comment in
-
Non-sugar sweeteners: lack of evidence that they help to control weight.BMJ. 2019 Jan 2;364:l7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l7. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30602576 No abstract available.
-
Non-sugar sweeteners and health.BMJ. 2019 Jan 3;364:k5005. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k5005. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30606710 No abstract available.
-
Sweeteners are added to modify consumer behaviour.BMJ. 2019 Jan 25;364:l366. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l366. BMJ. 2019. PMID: 30683659 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to change the behaviour of health professionals and the organisation of care to promote weight reduction in children and adults with overweight or obesity.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 30;11(11):CD000984. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000984.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29190418 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Replacing salt with low-sodium salt substitutes (LSSS) for cardiovascular health in adults, children and pregnant women.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 10;8(8):CD015207. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015207. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35944931 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Beverage Consumption and Growth, Size, Body Composition, and Risk of Overweight and Obesity: A Systematic Review [Internet].Alexandria (VA): USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review; 2020 Jul. Alexandria (VA): USDA Nutrition Evidence Systematic Review; 2020 Jul. PMID: 35349233 Free Books & Documents. Review.
-
Behavioral and Pharmacotherapy Weight Loss Interventions to Prevent Obesity-Related Morbidity and Mortality in Adults: An Updated Systematic Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [Internet].Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Sep. Report No.: 18-05239-EF-1. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2018 Sep. Report No.: 18-05239-EF-1. PMID: 30354042 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Chronic Use of Artificial Sweeteners: Pros and Cons.Nutrients. 2024 Sep 19;16(18):3162. doi: 10.3390/nu16183162. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 39339762 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Serum Erythritol and Risk of Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality in a Cohort of Men.Nutrients. 2024 Sep 14;16(18):3099. doi: 10.3390/nu16183099. Nutrients. 2024. PMID: 39339699 Free PMC article.
-
Artificially sweetened beverage consumption and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: an updated systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies.Nutr J. 2024 Jul 31;23(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12937-024-00985-7. Nutr J. 2024. PMID: 39085903 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the Sociodemographic and Health Characteristics of Non-Sugar Sweeteners Consumption in Greek School-Aged Children: A Cross-Sectional Study.Children (Basel). 2024 Jul 2;11(7):813. doi: 10.3390/children11070813. Children (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39062262 Free PMC article.
-
Could Insulin Be a Better Regulator of Appetite/Satiety Balance and Body Weight Maintenance in Response to Glucose Exposure Compared to Sucrose Substitutes? Unraveling Current Knowledge and Searching for More Appropriate Choices.Med Sci (Basel). 2024 Jun 6;12(2):29. doi: 10.3390/medsci12020029. Med Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38921683 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources