Comorbidities, anticoagulants, and geriatric-specific physiology for the field triage of injured older adults
- PMID: 30629015
- PMCID: PMC6370024
- DOI: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002195
Comorbidities, anticoagulants, and geriatric-specific physiology for the field triage of injured older adults
Abstract
Background: Comorbid conditions and anticoagulants have been considered as field triage criteria to raise the sensitivity for identifying seriously injured older adults, but research is sparse. We evaluated the utility of comorbidities, anticoagulant use, and geriatric-specific physiologic measures to improve the sensitivity of the field triage guidelines for high-risk older adults in the out-of-hospital setting.
Methods: This was a cohort study of injured adults 65 years or older transported by 44 emergency medical services agencies to 51 trauma and nontrauma hospitals in seven Oregon and Washington counties from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2011. Out-of-hospital predictors included current field triage criteria, 13 comorbidities, preinjury anticoagulant use, and previously developed geriatric specific physiologic measures. The primary outcome (high-risk patients) was Injury Severity Score of 16 or greater or need for major nonorthopedic surgical intervention. We used binary recursive partitioning to develop a clinical decision rule with a target sensitivity of 95% or greater.
Results: There were 5,021 older adults, of which 320 (6.4%) had Injury Severity Score of 16 or greater or required major nonorthopedic surgery. Of the 2,639 patients with preinjury medication history available, 400 (15.2%) were taking an anticoagulant. Current field triage practices were 36.6% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI], 31.2%-42.0%) and 90.1% specific (95% CI, 89.2%-91.0%) for high-risk patients. Recursive partitioning identified (in order): any current field triage criteria, Glasgow Coma Scale score of 14 or less, geriatric-specific vital signs, and comorbidity count of 2 or more. Anticoagulant use was not identified as a predictor variable. The new criteria were 90.3% sensitive (95% CI, 86.8%-93.7%) and 17.0% specific (95% CI, 15.8%-18.1%).
Conclusions: The current field triage guidelines have poor sensitivity for high-risk older adults. Adding comorbidity information and geriatric-specific physiologic measures improved sensitivity, with a decrement in specificity.
Level of evidence: Prognostic/Epidemiologic, level II.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Physiologic field triage criteria for identifying seriously injured older adults.Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4):461-70. doi: 10.3109/10903127.2014.912707. Epub 2014 Jun 16. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2014. PMID: 24933614 Free PMC article.
-
Geriatric-specific triage criteria are more sensitive than standard adult criteria in identifying need for trauma center care in injured older adults.Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Jan;65(1):92-100.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.04.019. Epub 2014 Jun 6. Ann Emerg Med. 2015. PMID: 24908590
-
Comparison of Injured Older Adults Included in vs Excluded From Trauma Registries With 1-Year Follow-up.JAMA Surg. 2019 Sep 1;154(9):e192279. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.2279. Epub 2019 Sep 18. JAMA Surg. 2019. PMID: 31290955 Free PMC article.
-
Development of statewide geriatric patients trauma triage criteria.Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011 Jun;26(3):170-9. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X11006315. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2011. PMID: 22107767 Review.
-
Towards improving prehospital triage for older trauma patients.Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Mar;54(2):125-129. doi: 10.1007/s00391-021-01844-4. Epub 2021 Jan 28. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2021. PMID: 33507358 Review. English.
Cited by
-
Comparison of Manchester, qSOFA, emergency severity index, and national early warning scores for prognostic estimation and effective triage system in geriatric patients.Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Aug;193(4):2051-2059. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03664-y. Epub 2024 Mar 14. Ir J Med Sci. 2024. PMID: 38483773
-
Relationship between systolic blood pressure and mortality in older vs younger trauma patients - a retrospective multicentre observational study.BMC Emerg Med. 2023 Sep 19;23(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12873-023-00863-1. BMC Emerg Med. 2023. PMID: 37726708 Free PMC article.
-
Accuracy of a Prehospital Triage Protocol in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality and Severe Trauma Cases among Older Adults.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1975. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031975. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023. PMID: 36767343 Free PMC article.
-
Research priorities for prehospital care of older patients with injuries: scoping review.Age Ageing. 2022 May 1;51(5):afac108. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac108. Age Ageing. 2022. PMID: 35604804 Free PMC article. Review.
-
National guideline for the field triage of injured patients: Recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2021.J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Aug 1;93(2):e49-e60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003627. Epub 2022 Apr 27. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022. PMID: 35475939 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Mackersie RC. History of trauma field triage development and the American College of Surgeons criteria. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(3):287–94. - PubMed
-
- Resources for Optimal Care of the Injured Patient. 6th. ed. Trauma. Co, editor: American College of Surgeons; 2014.
-
- Sasser SM, Hunt RC, Faul M, Sugerman D, Pearson WS, Dulski T, Wald MM, Jurkovich GJ, Newgard CD, Lerner EB, et al. Guidelines for field triage of injured patients: recommendations of the National Expert Panel on Field Triage, 2011. MMWR Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report Recommendations and reports / Centers for Disease Control. 2012;61(RR-1):1–20. - PubMed
-
- Lerner EB. Studies evaluating current field triage: 1966-2005. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006;10(3):303–6. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
