Noninvasive Quantification of Pressure-Volume Loops From Brachial Pressure and Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Dec;12(1):e008493. doi: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.118.008493.

Abstract

Background: Pressure-volume (PV) loops provide a wealth of information on cardiac function but are not readily available in clinical routine or in clinical trials. This study aimed to develop and validate a noninvasive method to compute individualized left ventricular PV loops.

Methods: The proposed method is based on time-varying elastance, with experimentally optimized model parameters from a training set (n=5 pigs), yielding individualized PV loops. Model inputs are left ventricular volume curves from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and brachial pressure. The method was experimentally validated in a separate set (n=9 pig experiments) using invasive pressure measurements and cardiovascular magnetic resonance images and subsequently applied to human healthy controls (n=13) and patients with heart failure (n=28).

Results: There was a moderate-to-excellent agreement between in vivo-measured and model-calculated stroke work (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.93; bias, -0.02±0.03 J), mechanical potential energy (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.57; bias, -0.04±0.03 J), and ventricular efficiency (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.84; bias, 3.5±2.1%). The model yielded lower ventricular efficiency ( P<0.0001) and contractility ( P<0.0001) in patients with heart failure compared with controls, as well as a higher potential energy ( P<0.0001) and energy per ejected volume ( P<0.0001). Furthermore, the model produced realistic values of stroke work and physiologically representative PV loops.

Conclusions: We have developed the first experimentally validated, noninvasive method to compute left ventricular PV loops and associated quantitative measures. The proposed method shows significant agreement with in vivo-derived measurements and could support clinical decision-making and provide surrogate end points in clinical heart failure trials.

Keywords: bias; biomarkers; heart failure; humans; magnetic resonance imaging.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Arterial Pressure*
  • Brachial Artery / physiopathology*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Female
  • Heart Failure / diagnostic imaging*
  • Heart Failure / physiopathology
  • Heart Ventricles / diagnostic imaging*
  • Heart Ventricles / physiopathology
  • Humans
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine*
  • Male
  • Models, Cardiovascular*
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Proof of Concept Study
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sus scrofa
  • Time
  • Ventricular Function, Left*
  • Ventricular Pressure*