Nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (IFCT-1501 MAPS2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-comparative, phase 2 trial
- PMID: 30660609
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30765-4
Nivolumab or nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with relapsed malignant pleural mesothelioma (IFCT-1501 MAPS2): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, non-comparative, phase 2 trial
Erratum in
-
Correction to Lancet Oncol 2019; 20: 239-53.Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):e132. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30109-3. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30842057 No abstract available.
Abstract
Background: There is no recommended therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma that has progressed after first-line pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. Disease control has been less than 30% in all previous studies of second-line drugs. Preliminary results have suggested that anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) monoclonal antibody could be efficacious in these patients. We thus aimed to prospectively assess the anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody alone or in combination with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte protein 4 (CTLA-4) antibody in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma.
Methods: This multicentre randomised, non-comparative, open-label, phase 2 trial was done at 21 hospitals in France. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, histologically proven malignant pleural mesothelioma progressing after first-line or second-line pemetrexed and platinum-based treatments, measurable disease by CT, and life expectancy greater than 12 weeks. Patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to receive intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg bodyweight) every 2 weeks, or intravenous nivolumab (3 mg/kg every 2 weeks) plus intravenous ipilimumab (1 mg/kg every 6 weeks), given until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Central randomisation was stratified by histology (epithelioid vs non-epithelioid), treatment line (second line vs third line), and chemosensitivity to previous treatment (progression ≥3 months vs <3 months after pemetrexed treatment) and used a minimisation method with a 0·8 random factor. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved 12-week disease control, assessed by masked independent central review; the primary endpoint would be met if disease control was achieved in at least 40% of patients. The primary endpoint was assessed in the first 108 eligible patients. Efficacy analyses were also done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in all patients who received at least one dose of their assigned treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02716272.
Findings: Between March 24 and August 25, 2016, 125 eligible patients were recruited and assigned to either nivolumab (n=63) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n=62). In the first 108 eligible patients, 12-week disease control was achieved by 24 (44%; 95% CI 31-58) of 54 patients in the nivolumab group and 27 (50%; 37-63) of 54 patients in the nivolumab plus ipilimumab group. In the intention-to-treat population, 12-week disease control was achieved by 25 (40%; 28-52) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 32 (52%; 39-64) of 62 patients in the combination group. Nine (14%) of 63 patients in the nivolumab group and 16 (26%) of 61 patients in the combination group had grade 3-4 toxicities. The most frequent grade 3 adverse events were asthenia (one [2%] in the nivolumab group vs three [5%] in the combination group), asymptomatic increase in aspartate aminotransferase or alanine aminotransferase (none vs four [7%] of each), and asymptomatic lipase increase (two [3%] vs one [2%]). No patients had toxicities leading to death in the nivolumab group, whereas three (5%) of 62 in the combination group did (one fulminant hepatitis, one encephalitis, and one acute kidney failure).
Interpretation: Anti-PD-1 nivolumab monotherapy or nivolumab plus anti-CTLA-4 ipilimumab combination therapy both showed promising activity in relapsed patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, without unexpected toxicity. These regimens require confirmation in larger clinical trials.
Funding: French Cooperative Thoracic Intergroup.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Checkpoint inhibitors in mesothelioma: hope for the future?Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):172-174. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30868-4. Epub 2019 Jan 16. Lancet Oncol. 2019. PMID: 30660608 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Ipilimumab and nivolumab in the treatment of recurrent malignant pleural mesothelioma (INITIATE): results of a prospective, single-arm, phase 2 trial.Lancet Respir Med. 2019 Mar;7(3):260-270. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30420-X. Epub 2019 Jan 16. Lancet Respir Med. 2019. PMID: 30660511 Clinical Trial.
-
First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):375-386. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32714-8. Epub 2021 Jan 21. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 33485464 Clinical Trial.
-
Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed pleural mesothelioma in the Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial.Lancet. 2016 Apr 2;387(10026):1405-1414. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01238-6. Epub 2015 Dec 21. Lancet. 2016. PMID: 26719230 Clinical Trial.
-
Nivolumab for the treatment of unresectable pleural mesothelioma.Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020 Feb;20(2):109-114. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2020.1703945. Epub 2019 Dec 16. Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2020. PMID: 31825692 Review.
-
Immune Checkpoint Inhibition for Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.Drugs. 2021 Jun;81(9):971-984. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01506-0. Epub 2021 Jun 9. Drugs. 2021. PMID: 34106454 Review.
Cited by
-
Immunotherapy of mesothelioma: the evolving change of a long-standing therapeutic dream.Front Immunol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1333661. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1333661. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2024. PMID: 38259475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Current Treatment Landscape of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma and Future Directions.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 12;15(24):5808. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245808. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38136353 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current State-of-the-Art Therapy for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma and Future Options Centered on Immunotherapy.Cancers (Basel). 2023 Dec 10;15(24):5787. doi: 10.3390/cancers15245787. Cancers (Basel). 2023. PMID: 38136333 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Efficacy and safety profile of combining antiangiogenic agents with chemotherapy in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.PLoS One. 2023 Dec 21;18(12):e0295745. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295745. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 38127857 Free PMC article.
-
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Staging and Radiological Response Criteria in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.Target Oncol. 2024 Jan;19(1):13-28. doi: 10.1007/s11523-023-01017-w. Epub 2023 Dec 8. Target Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38063957 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
