Skip to main page content
Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
, 60 (2), 155-162

What Is in a Genus Name? Conceptual and Empirical Issues Preclude the Proposed Recognition of Callibella (Callitrichinae) as a Genus

Affiliations

What Is in a Genus Name? Conceptual and Empirical Issues Preclude the Proposed Recognition of Callibella (Callitrichinae) as a Genus

Guilherme S T Garbino et al. Primates.

Abstract

In a recent article, Silva et al. (Zool Scr 47:133-143, 2018) proposed the relocation of the dwarf marmoset, Mico humilis, to the so far unrecognized genus Callibella. We contend that a taxonomic scheme that recognizes Callibella as if it were a valid genus is inadequately supported, and to some extent contradicted, by the ecological and morphological information provided by the authors. We discuss why the criterion of sympatry, invoked by Silva et al. to justify the recognition of Callibella at the genus level, is uninformative for taxonomic decisions above the species level. We also show that the morphological characteristics used by Silva et al. to separate Mico humilis from the other Mico are individually variable and present in every analyzed species of the genus. Moreover, we demonstrate that the Evolutionarily Distinct and Globally Endangered (EDGE) metric, employed by those authors to attempt to justify their taxonomic proposition, makes no sense in a taxonomic context. Conceptually, the use of autapomorphies and plesiomorphies to justify using Callibella goes against one of the main objectives of a meaningful classification, that is, to allow for all kinds of inferences based on previous observations (i.e., to be inductively projectible). Based on these arguments, we demonstrate that regarding Callibella as a subgenus of Mico is the most suitable way of making the Linnean taxonomy of marmosets congruent with the phylogenetic information available for the group.

Keywords: Classification; Dwarf marmoset; Genus concept; Mico humilis; Subgenus; Taxonomy.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):711-9 - PubMed
    1. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Feb;42(2):331-8 - PubMed
    1. PLoS One. 2007 Mar 14;2(3):e296 - PubMed
    1. Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Sep 7;275(1646):2031-7 - PubMed
    1. Q Rev Biol. 2009 Sep;84(3):253-76 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources

Feedback