Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope
- PMID: 30661373
- DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036088
Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope
Abstract
Background: The optimal duration of cardiac rhythm monitoring after emergency department (ED) presentation for syncope is poorly described. We sought to describe the incidence and time to arrhythmia occurrence to inform decisions regarding duration of monitoring based on ED risk stratification.
Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study with enrolled adult patients (≥16 years old) presenting within 24 hours of syncope at 6 EDs. We collected baseline characteristics, time of syncope and ED arrival, and the Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) risk category. We followed subjects for 30 days, and our adjudicated primary outcome was serious arrhythmic conditions (arrhythmias, interventions for arrhythmias, and unexplained death). After excluding patients with an obvious serious condition on ED presentation and those with missing CSRS predictors, we used Kaplan-Meier analysis to describe the time to serious arrhythmic outcomes.
Results: A total of 5581 patients (mean age, 53.4 years; 54.5% females; 11.6% hospitalized) were available for analysis, including 346 (6.2%) for whom the 30-day follow-up was incomplete and who were censored at the last follow-up time. A total of 417 patients (7.5%) experienced serious outcomes, 207 of which (3.7%; 95% CI, 3.3%-4.2%) were arrhythmic (161 arrhythmias, 30 cardiac device implantations, 16 unexplained deaths). Overall, 4123 (73.9%) were classified as CSRS low risk, 1062 (19.0%) medium risk, and 396 (7.1%) high risk. The CSRS accurately stratified subjects as low risk (0.4% risk for 30-day arrhythmic outcome), medium risk (8.7% risk), and high risk (25.3% risk). One-half of arrhythmic outcomes were identified within 2 hours of ED arrival in low-risk patients and within 6 hours in medium- and high-risk patients, and the residual risk after these cut points were 0.2% for low-risk, 5.0% for medium-risk, and 18.1% for high-risk patients. Overall, 91.7% of arrhythmic outcomes among medium- and high-risk patients, including all ventricular arrhythmias, were identified within 15 days. None of the low-risk patients experienced ventricular arrhythmia or unexplained death, whereas 0.9% of medium-risk patients and 6.3% of high-risk patients experienced them ( P<0.0001).
Conclusions: Serious underlying arrhythmia was often identified within the first 2 hours of ED arrival for CSRS low-risk patients and within 6 hours for CSRS medium- and high-risk patients. Outpatient cardiac rhythm monitoring for 15 days for selected medium-risk patients and all high-risk patients discharged from the hospital should also be considered.
Keywords: arrhythmia; cardiac rhythm monitoring; emergency service, hospital; outpatient monitoring; risk assessment; syncope.
Comment in
-
Letter by Zimmermann et al Regarding Article, "Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope".Circulation. 2019 Sep 17;140(12):e652-e653. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040355. Epub 2019 Sep 16. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 31525102 No abstract available.
-
Letter by Egerton-Warburton et al Regarding Article, "Duration of Electrocardiographic Monitoring of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope".Circulation. 2019 Sep 17;140(12):e654. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040717. Epub 2019 Sep 16. Circulation. 2019. PMID: 31525103 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Multicenter Emergency Department Validation of the Canadian Syncope Risk Score.JAMA Intern Med. 2020 May 1;180(5):737-744. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0288. JAMA Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32202605 Free PMC article.
-
ECG Predictors of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Older Adults With Syncope.Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;71(4):452-461.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Dec 21. Ann Emerg Med. 2018. PMID: 29275946 Free PMC article.
-
Does N-Terminal Pro-B-Type Natriuretic Peptide Improve the Risk Stratification of Emergency Department Patients With Syncope?Ann Intern Med. 2020 May 19;172(10):648-655. doi: 10.7326/M19-3515. Epub 2020 Apr 28. Ann Intern Med. 2020. PMID: 32340039
-
Management of patients with syncope and cardiac arrhythmias in an emergency department observation unit.Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001 Feb;19(1):105-21, vii. doi: 10.1016/s0733-8627(05)70170-x. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001. PMID: 11214393 Review.
-
Sudden death risk in syncope: the role of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator.Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013 Jan-Feb;55(4):443-53. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2012.10.015. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2013. PMID: 23472783 Review.
Cited by
-
Syncope in the Emergency Department: A Practical Approach.J Clin Med. 2024 May 30;13(11):3231. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113231. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892942 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The syncope core management process in the emergency department: a consensus statement of the EUSEM syncope group.Eur J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug 1;31(4):250-259. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001146. Epub 2024 Jun 13. Eur J Emerg Med. 2024. PMID: 38874507 Free PMC article.
-
[Monitoring of emergency cardiovascular patients in the emergency department : Consensus paper of the DGK, DGINA and DGIIN].Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023 Dec;118(Suppl 1):47-58. doi: 10.1007/s00063-023-01069-w. Epub 2023 Sep 15. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023. PMID: 37712970 Review. German.
-
Implementation of the Canadian syncope pathway: a pilot non-randomized stepped wedge trial.CJEM. 2023 Oct;25(10):808-817. doi: 10.1007/s43678-023-00570-7. Epub 2023 Aug 31. CJEM. 2023. PMID: 37651075
-
Arrhythmic syncope: From diagnosis to management.World J Cardiol. 2023 Apr 26;15(4):119-141. doi: 10.4330/wjc.v15.i4.119. World J Cardiol. 2023. PMID: 37124975 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
