Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer is a Viable Option for Men Younger than 60 Years
- PMID: 30664083
- DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000031
Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer is a Viable Option for Men Younger than 60 Years
Abstract
Purpose: At most centers strict age criteria are lacking for eligibility for active surveillance of prostate cancer. Younger men are often counseled to undergo definitive treatment despite limited data on the outcomes of active surveillance in younger men. We compared clinical characteristics and outcomes in men who enrolled in active surveillance at age less than 60 vs 60 years old or older.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 2 institutional cohorts of a total of 2,084 men in whom prostate cancer was managed by active surveillance between 1995 and 2016. We compared outcomes in men who began active surveillance at age 60 vs 60 years or older using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: We identified 417 and 1,667 men who began active surveillance at younger than 60 and 60 years old or older, respectively, who met study inclusion criteria. At a median followup of 6.2 years we found no significant difference between men younger than 60 and 60 years old or older in the 5-year rates of biopsy progression-free survival (83% vs 83%), treatment-free survival (74% vs 71%), metastasis-free survival (99.7% vs 99.0%) or prostate cancer specific survival (100% vs 99.7%). Of the younger men 131 (31%) ultimately underwent treatment, including for pathological progression in 67% and prostate specific antigen progression in 18%. On multivariate analysis significant predictors of biopsy progression and progression to treatment among younger men were 20% or greater involvement of any core on diagnostic biopsy (HR 2.21, p = 0.003) and prostate specific antigen density 0.15 ng/ml/ml or greater (HR 1.93, p = 0.01).
Conclusions: Active surveillance is a viable option in select men younger than 60 years with low volume, low risk prostate cancer. However, patients must be surveyed closely and understand the significant likelihood of ultimately requiring treatment.
Keywords: age factors; prostate-specific antigen; prostatectomy; prostatic neoplasms; watchful waiting.
Comment in
-
Editorial Comment.J Urol. 2019 Apr;201(4):727. doi: 10.1097/01.JU.0000554784.94443.b4. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 30947474 No abstract available.
-
Re: Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer is a Viable Option in Men Younger than 60 Years.Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):404. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 May 2. Eur Urol. 2019. PMID: 31056227 No abstract available.
-
Re: Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer is a Viable Option for Men Younger than 60 Years.J Urol. 2019 Oct;202(4):821. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000362. Epub 2019 Sep 6. J Urol. 2019. PMID: 31163008 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A multi-institutional evaluation of active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.J Urol. 2013 Jan;189(1 Suppl):S19-25; discussion S25. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.11.023. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23234624
-
Tumor Volume on Biopsy of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Managed with Active Surveillance.J Urol. 2018 Apr;199(4):954-960. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.029. Epub 2017 Oct 24. J Urol. 2018. PMID: 29074222
-
Expanded criteria to identify men eligible for active surveillance of low risk prostate cancer at Johns Hopkins: a preliminary analysis.J Urol. 2013 Dec;190(6):2033-8. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.05.015. Epub 2013 May 13. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23680308
-
Watchful waiting versus active surveillance: appropriate patient selection.Curr Urol Rep. 2008 May;9(3):211-6. doi: 10.1007/s11934-008-0037-9. Curr Urol Rep. 2008. PMID: 18765115 Review.
-
Defining and Measuring Adherence in Observational Studies Assessing Outcomes of Real-world Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Apr;4(2):192-201. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.06.009. Epub 2019 Jul 6. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 31288992 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical and functional outcomes for risk-appropriate treatments for prostate cancer.BJUI Compass. 2023 Sep 12;5(1):109-120. doi: 10.1002/bco2.288. eCollection 2024 Jan. BJUI Compass. 2023. PMID: 38179028 Free PMC article.
-
Patient and physician perspectives on treatments for low-risk prostate cancer: a qualitative study.BMC Cancer. 2023 Dec 5;23(1):1191. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-11679-4. BMC Cancer. 2023. PMID: 38053037 Free PMC article.
-
Old men with prostate cancer have higher risk of Gleason score upgrading and pathological upstaging after initial diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Jan 20;19(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02127-3. World J Surg Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33472645 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinicopathological characteristics of localized prostate cancer in younger men aged ≤ 50 years treated with radical prostatectomy in the PSA era: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Cancer Med. 2020 Sep;9(18):6473-6484. doi: 10.1002/cam4.3320. Epub 2020 Jul 22. Cancer Med. 2020. PMID: 32697048 Free PMC article.
-
Genitourinary cancer management during a severe pandemic: Utility of rapid communication tools and evidence-based guidelines.BJUI Compass. 2020 May;1(2):45-59. doi: 10.1002/bco2.18. Epub 2020 May 25. BJUI Compass. 2020. PMID: 32537615 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
