Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2019 Jan 22;3(1):4.
doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0093-6.

Health utilities and parental quality of life effects for three rare conditions tested in newborns

Affiliations

Health utilities and parental quality of life effects for three rare conditions tested in newborns

Norma-Jean Simon et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes. .

Abstract

Background: Measurement of health utilities is required for economic evaluations. Few studies have evaluated health utilities for rare conditions; even fewer have incorporated disutility that may be experienced by caregivers. This study aimed to (1) estimate health utilities for three rare conditions currently recommended for newborn screening at the state or federal level, and (2) estimate the disutility, or spillover, experienced by parents of patients diagnosed with a rare, heritable disorder.

Methods: A stated-preference survey using a time trade-off approach elicited health utilities for Krabbe disease, phenylketonuria, and Pompe disease at varying stages (mild, moderate, severe) and onset of disease symptoms (infancy, childhood, and adulthood). We recruited respondents from a nationally representative community sample (n = 862). Respondents valued disease specific health states in three consecutive question frames: (1) adult health state (> = 18 years of age), (2) child health state (< 18 years of age), and (3) as a parent of a child with a condition (parent spillover state). Corresponding mean utilities were calculated for plausible disease states in adulthood and childhood. Mean disutility was estimated for parental spillover. Predictors of utilities were evaluated using a negative binomial regression model.

Results: More severe conditions and infant health states received lower estimated utility and greater estimated disutility among parents. Conditions with the lowest estimated health utilities were severe infantile Pompe disease (0.40, CI: 0.34-0.46) and infantile Krabbe disease (0.37, CI: 0.32-0.43). Disutility was evident for all conditions evaluated (range: 0.07-0.19).

Conclusions: Rare childhood conditions are associated with substantial estimated losses in quality of life. Evidence of disutility among parents further warrants the inclusion of spillover effects in cost-effectiveness analyses. Continued research is needed to assess and measure the effects of childhood disease from a family perspective.

Keywords: Cost-effectiveness; Family effects; Health disutility; Health utilities; Krabbe; Newborn screening; Phenylketonuria; Pompe; Spillover; Time trade-off.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI and the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services. UM Protocol No. HUM00079907; MDHHS Protocol No. 201408–14-EA. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Rare Disorder Descriptions
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Sample of a Health State Animation*
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Sample of a Time Trade-Off Question
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Health Utilities by Disease Condition and Age of Symptom Experience or Onset

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Insinga RP, Laessig RH, Hoffman GL. Newborn screening with tandem mass spectrometry: Examining its cost-effectiveness in the Wisconsin newborn screening panel. J Pediatr. 2002;141(4):524–531. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2002.128116. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Association of Public Health Laboratories. The newborn screening story: How one simple test saved lives, science, and health in America [https://www.aphl.org/aboutAPHL/publications/Documents/NBS_2013May_The-Ne...] Accessed 2018 December 7
    1. Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children. Recommended Uniform Screening Panel [https://www.hrsa.gov/advisorycommittees/mchbadvisory/heritabledisorders/...] Accessed 2017 May 1
    1. Baby's First Test. Conditions Screened By State [http://www.babysfirsttest.org/newborn-screening/states] Accessed 2017 May 1.
    1. Neumann PJ, Goldie SJ, Weinstein MC. Preference-based measures in economic evaluation in health care. Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21(1):587–611. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.21.1.587. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources